常见问题

CDP评分提供环境披露情况和表现，针对任何通过CDP披露的主体或组织，例如企业（包含小型企业、中型企业或中小型企业）、城市、州和地区。积极的环境行动必须从一个准确的、透明的环境影响和环保进展评估开始，CDP评分使其变得可能。CDP从2010年开始对企业评分，自2018年开始对城市评分。今年是CDP对州和地区进行评分的第二年。

我们的评分向这些组织以及他们的利益相关方展示了他们在实现1.5度目标、零毁林以及水环境安全的未来道路上的进展。通过逐年披露，企业、城市、州和地区可以理解他们实现环境目标过程中的轨迹。

我们的问卷和评分方法学激励披露主体衡量并管理其环境影响。信息披露驱动行动，通过对企业进行从D-到A的评分，我们引导他们走上从披露开始，经过认知和管理阶段，最终实现领导力的路径。

我们的问卷依据《国际财务报告准测》（IFRS）S2 气候相关披露以及气候相关财务信息披露组（TCFD）建议编制，提供涵盖全球市场的可对比数据。

了解更多关于CDP 与披露框架和标准的一致性的信息。

Responding organizations are assessed and scored across four consecutive levels which represent the steps an organization moves through as it progresses towards environmental stewardship.

Disclosure (D- or D)

Nearly every question in the questionnaire is scored for Disclosure (except for biodiversity and plastics questions). The Disclosure score measures the completeness of an organization’s reporting. The number of points allocated to each question depends on both the amount of data requested and their relative importance to data users.

Awareness (C- or C)

The Awareness score measures the comprehensiveness of an organization’s evaluation of how environmental issues intersect with their business. The Awareness score does not indicate that an organization has taken any actions to address environmental issues beyond initial screenings or assessments.

Management (B- or B)

Management points are awarded for answers that provide evidence of undertaking actions associated with good environmental management, based on awareness of the organization’s impact on the environmental issue. The Management score measures whether organizations are managing their environmental impact, but does indicate whether they are undertaking actions that mark them out as a leader in their field.

Leadership (A- or A)

To earn leadership status, organizations must demonstrate best practice in the strategies they utilize and the actions they undertake. These actions represent best practice as formulated by organizations working with CDP to advance environmental stewardship and, in many cases, are already embodied by organizations leading in environmental policy and practice.

Please refer to our scoring introduction for corporates to get an overview of the scoring process for disclosing companies.

In 2026, SMEs that demonstrate leading actions will be able to achieve an SME A score for climate change. This change will allow SMEs to highlight the steps they are taking to address their climate impact and will provide a clear, tangible path to improve over time.

The SME questionnaire offers a streamlined disclosure pathway, tailored to the resources of SME organizations. The SME A score will make it easier to understand where to focus attention, build capacity, and act. An SME A shows leadership within this sphere.

Note, the SME A score is not equivalent to the full corporate questionnaire A score. We strongly encourage your organization to disclose through the full corporate questionnaire if you are engaging with capital markets, responding to customers, or working towards leadership recognition. You can learn more about the SME A score in our signposting document.

Please refer to our scoring introduction document for scoring introduction for SMEs to get an overview of the scoring process for disclosing SMEs.

Jurisdictions are assessed across four scoring bands which represent the steps jurisdictions move through as they progress towards climate leadership.

Disclosure (D- or D)

A jurisdiction in the Disclosure scoring band has just started the journey of understanding and reporting on climate impacts. These jurisdictions understand the value of collecting data to drive climate action but may not have structures or resources in place to obtain the necessary information. Jurisdictions in the Disclosure band report on the degree to which climate impacts and risks have been measured.

Awareness (C- or C)

A jurisdiction in the Awareness scoring band is in the process of assessing the main risks and impacts of climate change. These jurisdictions have begun developing an assessment and measuring impacts to get a holistic understanding of the main effects climate change has on their jurisdiction and are beginning to take action to reduce them.

Management (B- or B)

A jurisdiction in the Management band has managed to gather data on the main risks and impacts of climate change and is taking action to adapt to and reduce these effects. These jurisdictions have worked collaboratively with key stakeholders to understand their risks and impacts and now have plans in place to mitigate and/or adapt.

Leadership (A- or A)

A Leadership jurisdiction demonstrates best practice standards across adaptation and mitigation, has set ambitious goals and made progress towards achieving those goals. Jurisdictions in the Leadership band have strategic, holistic plans in place to ensure the actions they are taking will reduce climate impacts and vulnerabilities of the people, businesses, and organizations in their jurisdiction.

Please refer to our scoring introduction for cities, states and regions to get an overview of the scoring process for these disclosing entities.

“未披露”评分反映的是：当企业收到了资本市场联署投资机构的披露邀请但未回应该邀请的情况。该评分将体现在所有企业收到披露邀请但未进行回应的环境议题上。

“未披露”状态代表未向 CDP 提供足以用于评估的信息。该评分不代表公司在环境管理方面的实际表现。

CDP 的评分方法学评估的是披露主体回答的详尽程度与全面性，及其对环境议题的认知、管理方法和环境管理进展。

问卷评分主要由经过严格质量检验的自动化评分系统完成。在需要评估开放式文本回复时，将由经CDP培训和认证的评分合作伙伴进行补充评分。随后，由我们的内部评分团队对所有评分进行汇总，并开展数据质量审查，以确保评分标准的准确性和一致性。

CDP 不断提高获得领导力级别评分的门槛。因此，不能保证一个主体能够连续跻身CDP A评分名单，除非它能够逐年跟随科学进展和市场需求不断演进。

于 CDP 门户网站中探索我们的 2026 年评分方法学，并导出为简便的 PDF 格式。您可以在我们的如何披露页面查看其他 CDP 评分相关材料。

除了在一个评分级别达到最低分数才能进入下一个级别外，CDP还采用了一套基本准则。

要在指定评分等级内获得相应得分，回复中需满足相关标准。即使回复者通过了某个评分等级的阈值，但如果他们没有达到该等级相关的所有基本准则，则没有资格获得该等级的评分。

在过去几年中，CDP 只采用了获得“A”评分的基本准则，即组织必须满足这些标准才能进入 CDP 的 A 评分名单。

2024 年，CDP 在认知、管理和领导力等级引入了气候变化基本准则，以及纳入 A 评分名单的新要求。

这将为 CDP 气候变化评分的每个等级设定一致的报告基线，确保填补所有组织达到适当披露基线所需的关键差距。它还将确保组织纳入关键数据点，这些数据点对于了解他们如何评估和应对环境问题至关重要。

2026 年森林和水安全评分基本准则仅适用于领导力等级和 A 评分。

完整详情可以在我们的气候变化、森林和水安全基本准则文件中查阅。

To receive a score in the Management band (B/B-), organizations are demonstrating that they are beginning to take action to address environmental issues. For example, efforts are made to mitigate risk, advance environmental accounting, and assemble robust and comprehensive risk assessments.

To be awarded a score in the Leadership band (A/A-), organizations are demonstrating best practice in managing environmental issues – for companies, they have fully integrated environmental issues into their business strategies. For example, an organization is actively tracking progress against a 1.5°C aligned transition plan that is publicly available, are engaging with their suppliers on environmental issues, and may have an organization-wide Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction target that is validated by the Science Based Targets Initiative.

You can learn more about our scoring levels above (‘How do CDP scores work?’).

A CDP score is based on information disclosed by an entity in its CDP response. Significant actions or activities not mentioned in the CDP response are only considered at a final leadership level.

CDP scores alone are not a comprehensive metric of an entity’s level of sustainability or 'green-ness', but instead indicate the level of action reported by them to assess and manage its environmental impacts during the reporting year.