- On average, 14% of steel companies’ value is at risk from rising carbon prices1
- Sector expected to reduce emissions by less than 50% by 2050, compared to the 65% reduction needed to keep global warming below 2°C
- Chinese, Russian and US companies lagging behind European and East Asian peers on environmental performance and transparency
- SSAB, ArcelorMittal, Hyundai Steel and Tata Steel lead on business readiness for a low-carbon transition while Beijing Shougang, US Steel and Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel lagging
Wednesday 31st July 2019, London: A new report, analysing a US$259bn grouping of the world’s 20 largest steel companies, has found that the steel sector is failing to reduce emissions at the rate required to keep global warming below 2°C – putting, on average, 14% of the companies’ potential value at risk.1
More than 90% of metal produced in the world is steel, and the steel sector is responsible for up to 9% of global greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel use and industry – more than the entire emissions of India. With 650 million tonnes (Mt) of steel recycled each year, it is also the world’s most recycled material and as such has a central role to play in driving forward the circular economy.
Today’s ‘Melting Point’ report, from environmental non-profit and investment research provider CDP, finds that there is a significant gap between company emissions reductions and the required trajectories for keeping global temperature rises below 2°C. To achieve this, the sector must reduce its emissions by 65% by 2050. However, cumulative company targets suggest a reduction of less than 50% by 2050.
Alarmingly, existing steel production techniques are already close to the limits of their efficiency and so meeting the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement will require a radical step change by the industry.
This is creating material financial risk for steel giants. Approximately 86% of steel production is covered by existing or planned carbon pricing markets and, given the scenario of a $100 carbon price by 2040, the average value at risk for these 20 companies would be 14%.1
The report also reveals a significant geographical divide between the highest and lowest performing companies. European and East Asian companies have been proactive, setting ambitious emissions reduction targets and investing in a number of innovative low-carbon technologies. Chinese, Russian and U.S. companies lag behind in terms of disclosure and performance across most key areas and have demonstrated little evidence of developing low-carbon technologies.
Water is used throughout the steelmaking process so is crucial to the survival of the steel industry. It is therefore concerning that across the 20 companies, over 50% of inland steel capacity is exposed to high levels of water-stress risk, such as a decrease in supply of freshwater and an increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events such as drought. Company operations located in China and India are most at risk.
Encouragingly, some companies are taking steps to decarbonize and six of the companies have delivered technologies that could drive a step-change in emissions performance. These include:
- SSAB has set a goal to reach carbon neutrality by 2045 across its entire operations, while Hyundai Steel have targeted an 80% reduction in emissions by 2050.
- SSAB is co-developing the HYBRIT project to develop green hydrogen steelmaking technologies.
- ArcelorMittal is developing a suite of innovative technologies including SIDERWIN which uses electricity for the direct reduce of iron oxides, and Carbon2value – a Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) technology to separate CO2 from waste gases.
- Four companies (ArcelorMittal, Baoshan Iron & Steel, Beijing Shougang and Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel) have partnered with the carbon recycling company Lanzatech, which converts waste gases from the steelmaking process to produce bioethanol.
Luke Fletcher, Senior Analyst at CDP commented:“The pace at which the steel sector is reducing emissions is too slow for the transition to a low-carbon economy and it needs to deploy and commercialise radical technologies if it is to avoid looming carbon costs and remain competitive. Recent events at British Steel are an example of the huge financial risks the sector faces and companies need to show evidence that strategies are being adopted to ensure resilience for the changes ahead.
The good news is that technologies to decouple carbon emissions from steel production are emerging; from hydrogen steelmaking to electrolysis using clean electricity. Plus, the sector is already a global leader in recycling, with steel now the world’s most recycled material.”
CDP’s League Table of companies in the steel sector:
|League Table rank||Company||Country / Region||2018 steel production (million tonnes)||League Table weighted rank||Transition risks rank||Physical risks rank||Transition opportunities rank||Climate governance & strategy rank|
|3||Hyundai Steel||South Korea||23.8||8.25||1||3||9||4|
|11||Baoshan Iron & Steel||China||47.1||12.71||15||11||7||13|
|15||Novolipetsk Steel (NLMK)||Russia||17.4||13.91||12||13||19||12|
|20||Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel||China||15.2||15.74||16||18||18||19|
Angang Steel, Baoshan Iron & Steel, Beijing Shougang, BlueScope Steel, Gerdau, Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel, NLMK, Nucor and US Steel did not respond to CDP’s 2018 climate change questionnaire. We encourage investors to raise this lack of transparency in discussions with company management.
- ENDS -
Notes to editors:
For more information or for exclusive interviews please contact:
Rojin Kiadeh, CDP
e: [email protected]
t: +44 0203 818 3973
Tess Harris, CDP
e: [email protected]
t: +44 0203 818 3973
Scope and methodology: Full details of the scope of the report and methodology used are included in the full version of the report. For the full report please contact [email protected]
CDP is an international non-profit that drives companies and governments to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, safeguard water resources and protect forests. Voted number one climate research provider by investors and working with institutional investors with assets of US$96 trillion, we leverage investor and buyer power to motivate companies to disclose and manage their environmental impacts. Over 7,000 companies with over 50% of global market capitalization disclosed environmental data through CDP in 2018. This is in addition to the over 750 cities, states and regions who disclosed, making CDP’s platform one of the richest sources of information globally on how companies and governments are driving environmental change. CDP, formerly Carbon Disclosure Project, is a founding member of the We Mean Business Coalition. Visit https://cdp.net/en or follow us @CDP to find out more.
This research is part of a series of award-winning in-depth sector analysis by CDP to provide investors with the most comprehensive environmental data analysis. It aims to identify the most material metrics for each specific sector and how they link to financial performance. Our methodology is unique as the weighting assigned to each metric is transparent and can be applied individually according to investor preferences. These rankings are not intended to identify definitive winners and losers for investment purposes, but rather to indicate strategic advantage in an industry where there is a significant regulatory impact on all major markets.
Reports on the oil & gas, steel, cement, automotive, electric utilities, chemicals, mining, capital goods, consumer goods and shipping industries were released between 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.
This is an update to the report on the steel sector released in October 2016.
1 The analysis finds that under a 2°C scenario where global carbon prices rise to US$100 per tonne CO2 by 2040, the weighted average Value at Risk for the company sample is 14% of net present value (NPV), ranging from 2.5% to 30% for individual companies.