Search Results

 

You need to login or register to view this content

All our reports and results are available free of charge personal use, and/or non-commercial use, however, you must first register with us to view our data.

View full Terms and Conditions



Log In

Respondent CDP 2009: Symantec Corporation

General introduction
Symantec (www symantec com) global leader providing security storage systems management solutions help customers consumers small businesses largest global organizations secure manage information risks points completely efficiently company company’ s unique focus eliminate risks information technology processes independent device platform interaction location Founded 1982 headquartered Cupertino California Symantec evolved world’ s largest software companies 17 500 employees 40 countries Symantec committed minimizing environmental footprint conserving natural resources depend consider compliance applicable environmental laws regulations baseline performance continually look innovative ways decrease energy water materials use Symantec’ s environmental strategy features key components • Green (including Green Data Center) Symantec established practices minimize energy use optimize performance clients’ data centers solutions facilitate server virtualization storage consolidation help reduce hardware energy needs • Resource conservation Symantec aims conserve energy materials minimize waste locations • Responsible software packaging integrate concept reduce/reuse/recycle packaging design manufacture deliver majority software products electronically order conserve materials energy • Transportation Symantec works reduce employee commuting business travel reduce greenhouse gas emissions Symantec participating member variety leading organizations • Green Grid consortium information technology companies professionals seeking lower overall consumption power data centers globe organization chartered develop meaningful platform neutral standards measurement methods processes new technologies improve energy efficient performance global data centers Symantec Data Center Services Manager Dan Azevedo serving Vice Chair Measurements Metrics Work Group consortium's Technical Committee • United Nations Global Compact framework businesses committed aligning operations strategies universally accepted principles areas human rights labour environment anti corruption Director Corporate Responsibility Cecily Joseph serving U S Network Representative • Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) industry consortium dedicated development promotion standards storage storage networking technologies educational services empower community 2007 SNIA created new groups aimed addressing "green" standards storage Green Storage Technical Work Group established roadmap create standards measuring managing power consumption storage Vice President Engineering Jose Iglesias serving Corporate Representative • Climate Leaders United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA industry government partnership 2002 provides guidance recognition companies developing long term climate change strategies Climate Leaders allows highlight expand accomplished demonstrating environmental stewardship public responsibility Program Manager Global Facilities Management Kelly Shea serving Corporate Representative • United States Green Building Council non profit trade organization promotes sustainability buildings designed built operated USGBC best known development Leadership Energy Environmental Design (LEED) rating Greenbuild green building conference promotes green building industry including environmentally responsible materials sustainable architecture techniques public policy Program Manager Global Facilities Management Kelly Shea serving Corporate Representative company recognized Corporate Responsibility work following recent awards • 2008 Ceres ACCA Sustainability Reporting Award Time Reporter• 2009 National Business Travel Association Time CSR Award• Ranked 23rd CRO 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2009• Ranked #4 Software Category 2008 Fortune Admired Companies List (Source FORTUNE Magazine March 2008) • Recognized 2009 World’ s Ethical Companies (Source Ethisphere)Finally Symantec focusing engaging employees launched “ It’ s right thing do” awareness campaign featuring quarterly Global newsletter emailed employees intranet sites provide employees resources information Symantec putting corporate environmental commitment practice information environmental programs visit http //www symantec com/about/profile/responsibility/index jsp


Risk and Opportunities
1 Regulatory Risks (CDP6 1(a)(i))
1 1 company exposed regulatory risks related climate change
We consider our company to be exposed to regulatory risks. 
Symantec likely affected varying extent different parts world climate change regulations adopted operate business areas begun introduce climate change regulatory compliance language requirements and/or guidelines including California various parts Europe able predict exact future impact(s) expect experience level change time operating practices and/or operating costs result likelihood exists affected indirectly cases directly impact climate change regulations clients partners customers suppliers Additionally threat regulation impact company’ s business practices Symantec founding member Software Assurance Forum Excellence Code (SafeCode) Symantec Microsoft Nokia Juniper Networks SAP EMC came develop industry wide best practices improve security software

 
information

 
2 Physical Risks (CDP6 1(a)(ii))
2 1 company exposed physical risks climate change
We consider our company to be exposed to physical risks. 
Symantec’ s real estate portfolio workforce exposed physical risks potential infrastructure damage related power outages resulting rising sea levels increased storm activity hurricanes droughts flooding wildfires health risks spread diseases Rising energy costs potential brown outs pose risk customers data centers Periodically various groups company Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery Corporate Security Safety formally evaluate risks plan adverse events risks include pandemic outbreaks natural man disasters supplier disruptions degree types events related climate change company processes place evaluate respond best knowledge time Symantec currently exposed actual physical risks climate change anticipate future risk assessment planning activities encompass consideration possible climate change physical risks particularly susceptible vulnerable locations Symantec operates 40 countries world planning likely consider issues rising sea levels droughts floods severe storms and/or disruptions energy grid Additionally manage risks GHG emissions operations identify cost effective mitigation opportunities Symantec joined U S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s Climate Leaders program 2009 Climate Leaders program Symantec committed 1) Develop corporate wide GHG inventory major greenhouse gases report progress annually based detailed EPA protocols guidance 2) Develop corporate GHG Inventory Management Plan based detailed EPA checklist institutionalize inventory process and3) Set aggressive corporate wide GHG emissions reduction goal achieved 5 10 years EPA works closely company Climate Leaders program review GHG inventory Inventory Management Plan provide guidance setting aggressive GHG emissions reduction goal goals announced EPA program analyzed ensure significantly better business usual approved EPA senior management

 
information

 
3 Risks (CDP6 1(a)(iii))
3 1 company exposed risks result climate change
We consider our company to be exposed to other risks. 
Yes risk related employees market share reputation increasing customers stakeholders including SRI’ s NGO’ s climate change measures company taking address concerns Companies vulnerable reputation risk appropriate steps taken timely manner anticipate company required comply new regulations related climate change near future New regulations represent risks opportunities Symantec assess process identify comply regulations worldwide expect focus particularly regulations pertaining environmental management carbon footprint reduction energy efficiency

 
information

 
4 Regulatory Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(i))
4 1 regulatory requirements climate change present opportunities company
Regulatory requirements present opportunities for my company. 
Yes extent regulatory requirements climate change relate power consumption Symantec opportunity help customers gain efficiencies power consumption Symantec developed solutions technologies virtualization duplication help organizations save money reduce energy consumption green question 6 1 details Symantec’ s customer solutions

 
information

 
5 Physical Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(ii))
5 1 physical changes resulting climate change present opportunities company
Physical changes present opportunities for my company. 
Yes potential physical changes presented Symantec opportunity make significant changes real estate portfolio facilities practices Energy consumption Symantec actively working decrease quantity energy used offices Energy Star based Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) energy management program helps measuring current energy performance setting goals tracking savings rewarding improvements Commercial buildings earned ENERGY STAR use average 35% energy typical similar buildings generate carbon dioxide Symantec’ s buildings achieved Energy Star 2007 2008 Springfield Energy Star centric applying requirements owned sites globe sites include Cupertino CA Mountain View CA Roseville MN Dublin Ireland Pune India Green Park UK steps taken decrease energy consumption including installation vending machine motion sensor economizers low consumption compact fluorescent lamps restroom hand dryers utilization natural day light LEED Buildings Symantec subscribes globally Leadership Energy Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating Developed U S Green Building Council (USGBC) (http //www usgbc org/) globally recognized LEED provides suite standards environmentally sustainable construction ongoing operations Symantec focusing achieving minimum LEED NC Silver newly constructed buildings LEED CI Certified commercial Interiors LEED EB Certified existing owned buildings Culver City CA office received LEED Gold NC certification Springfield site recently awarded LEED Gold EB certification goal LEED certify owned sites implement LEED framework globally leased sites fiscal year 2012 LEED certification process Symantec working o Enhance commissioning practices unsure equipment running properlyo Identify energy inefficiencies assist reducing GHG emissionso Purchase Energy Star Equipmento Remove harmful refrigerantso Divert waste landfillso Reduce water consumptiono Purchase furniture office supplies include recycled contento Use Green Seal gleaning products Waste Management Reduce reuse recycle adopted Symantec’ s philosophy waste management Symantec encourage reduction focusing minimizing resource energy use providing everyday amenities office seek purchase sustainable goods asks employees consider using disposable products Symantec explores alternatives disposal donating goods schools charitable organizations programs listed areas Symantec recognized ability effect change percentages reflect global sites currently participating program continuously working raise participation worldwide Program Area Recycling areas available Percentage sites participating worldwideDesk Recycling 34%Break Room 63%Copy Area 66%Conference Room 31%Program Area Products Recycled Paper 71%Aluminum cans 49%Batteries 40%Cardboard 61%Cell phones 50%Ewaste 63%Water Consumption Symantec striving water conservation programs listed areas Symantec recognized ability effect change percentages reflect global sites currently participating program continuously working raise participation worldwide Program Area Percentage sites participating worldwideLow flow toilets 45%Waterless urinals 9%Motion sensor facets 25%Water efficient landscape 17%Irrigation management 20%Storm water management 16%

 
information

 
6 Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(iii))
6 1 Does climate change present opportunities company
Climate change presents other opportunities for my company. 
Symantec recognizes facing increasingly complex comprehensive environmental challenges energy costs typical data center doubling years growing demand software systems reduce need electricity make efficient use existing resources Working closely customers offering free analysis data center operations providing complete suite energy reducing efficiency improving software climate change presented Symantec opportunity help customers build “ green data centers” Symantec Altiris Veritas software products help customers reduce energy consumption improve utilization assets “ green data centers” positive environmental impact generate significant cost savings performance benefits products services adding value Symantec customers • Veritas™ Application Director allows physical virtual server consolidation reduce power consumption slow growth new hardware installation • Veritas™ Storage Foundation provides storage tiering non critical data energy demanding storage sites • Veritas™ Command Central Storage finds regions wasted space inactive data enterprise enables administrators utilize memory assets efficiently • Veritas™ NetBackup reduces space needed storage eliminating duplicate data memory • Symantec Enterprise Vault eradicates duplicate email messages dramatically shrinks storage – power – requirements • Altiris Energy Saver Toolkit enables administrators aggressively manage desktop workstation energy consumption • Company consulting services help customers design data centers optimal equipment configuration capacity power usage Climate Change presented Symantec opportunity modify packaging products integrate concept reduce/reuse/recycle packaging design manufacture deliver majority software products electronically order conserve materials energy Internally Symantec developed commute alternatives program employees response climate change Services vary site include Commuter Spending Account (CSA) employee benefit program allows employees set aside money pre tax basis pay certain expenses incurred traveling work Bicycle storing shower rooms Public transportation pass Ride Sharing Shuttle Services

 
information

 
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Accounting, Emissions Intensity, Energy and Trading
7 Reporting Year (CDP6 Q2(a)(ii))
Information respond section “ Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)” developed World Resources Institute World Business Council Sustainable Development (“ GHG Protocol” ) http //www ghgprotocol org/ ISO 14064 1 compatible GHG Protocol number regional/national programme protocols information http //www ghgprotocol org/ use guidance button provide CDP responses questions 7 8 9 10 1 10 2 11 1 11 2 years prior current reporting year time answered CDP information request work backwards current reporting year enter data oldest reporting period Questions 10 1 10 2 11 1 11 2 subsequent webpages dates answer question 7 carried forwards automatically populate webpages
7 1 state start date end date year reporting GHG emissions
Start date 01 April 2008End date 31 March 2009Other Fiscal Year 2007 Start date 01 April 2006 End date 31 March 2007 Financial accounting year 01 April 2006 Fiscal Year 2008 Start date 01 April 2007 End date 31 March 2008 Financial accounting year 01 April 2007 Fiscal Year 2009 Start date 01 April 2008 End date 31 March 2009 Financial accounting year 01 April 2008

 
8 Reporting Boundary (CDP6 Q2(a)(i)) 8 1 indicate category describes company entities group Scope 1 Scope 2 GHG emissions reported
Companies over which financial control is exercised – per consolidated audited Financial Statements. 

 
8 2 state parts business sources GHG emissions excluded reporting boundary
Companies financial control exercised – consolidated audited financial statements organisation financial control operation ability direct financial operating policies operation view gaining economic benefits activities Generally organisation financial control operation GHG accounting purposes operation treated group company subsidiary purposes financial consolidation

 
9 Methodology (CDP6 Q2(a)(iii)) 9 1 process used company calculate Scope 1 Scope 2 GHG emissions including standard protocol methodology used collect activity data calculate Scope 1 Scope 2 GHG emissions provide answer text box addition description relevant select methodology list published methodologies aid automated analysis data
Fiscal Year 2007 Symantec measured Scope 2 CO2 output 1 37 pounds KWh consumed GHG Protocol reported information available time looking include additional historical data year’ s report reflect entire portfolio fiscal year 2007 Fiscal Year 2008 Symantec measured Scope 2 CO2 output 1 37 pounds KWh consumed GHG Protocol reported information available time did report entire portfolio missing historical data updated information report reflect missing information obtained Fiscal Year 2009 2009 Symantec gathered data used country specific emissions factors based GHG Protocol “ Indirect CO2 Emissions Purchased Electricity” Version 3 0 March 2008 developed World Resources Institute (WRI) association electric grid sub region defined eGRID quantify emissions Scope 2 tools used Greenhouse Gas Protocol initiative website http //www ghgprotocol org/Symantec quantified Scope 2 Indirect Emissions compiling electricity bills utility companies reporting sites paid utility’ s Fiscal Year 2009 includes owned sites leased sites “ Dark” sites (Dark sites include locations pay utilities employees currently working) reporting sites landlord pays utility bills e suites year represent 1% total global Real Estate portfolio future Symantec calculate corporate wide emissions using Climate Leaders GHG Inventory Guidance defines Partners working EPA account report GHG emissions Guidance based existing GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting Reporting Standard developed World Resources Institute World Business Council Sustainable Development Climate Leaders GHG Inventory Guidance details methodologies quantifying emissions Scope 1 Scope 2 emissions Scope 3 methodologies employee commuting business travel

 
Select methodologies
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)


 
provide

 
9 2 Details assumptions
section 9 1

 
9 3 names links calculation tools used
section 9 1

 
Select calculation tools
GHG Protocol - Indirect CO2 emissions from purchased electricity 3.0 March 2008


 
9 4 global warming potentials applied origin
section 9 1

 
9 5 emission factors applied origin
section 9 1

 
information

 
10 Scope 1 Direct GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(b)(i))
Instructions question 10 question 11 (following page)When providing answers questions 10 11 deduct offset credits Renewable Energy Certificates net estimated avoided emissions export renewable energy carbon sequestration (including enhanced oil recovery) use goods services Opportunities provide details activities reduce avoid emissions provided information request Carbon dioxide emissions biologically sequestered carbon e g carbon dioxide burning biomass/biofuels reported separately emissions Scopes 1 2 3 relevant report emissions question 15 include nitrous oxide methane emissions biomass/biofuel combustion emissions scopes
answer following questions using Table 1 provide 10 1 Total gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions metric tonnes CO2 ePlease break total gross global Scope 1 emissions 10 2 Country regionPlease provide CDP responses questions 10 1 10 2 years prior current reporting year time answered CDP information request work backwards current reporting year enter data oldest reporting period Table 1 (below) table 5 (Q11 1 11 2) automatically populated dates answer 7 1 Electric utilities report emissions country/region using table question EU3 Table 1 use numbers Use “ Other” option drop menu enter region
Reporting year Q7.1 Start date 01/04/2008
Reporting year Q7.1 End date 31/03/2009
10.1 Total gross global Scope 1 GHG
emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e
0

10.2 Gross Scope 1 emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e by country or region


 
answer question 10 1 automatically carried forward tables 2 3 add country region answer 10 2 press “ Save” end page tick box total gross global Scope 1 figure (Q10 1) includes emissions transferred outside reporting boundary (as given answer 8 1) report transfers 13 5

 
facilitate better understanding business break total global Scope 1 emissions 10 3 Business divisionand/or10 4 Facility10 3 Business division (only data current reporting year requested)Table 2 use numbers
Business Divisions - Enter names below
Scope 1 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q10.1 0

 
10 4 Facility (only data current reporting year requested)Table 3 use numbers
Facilities - Enter names below
Scope 1 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q10.1 0

 
10 5 break total global Scope 1 GHG emissions metric tonnes gas metric tonnes CO2 e GHG type (Only data current reporting year requested )Table 4 use numbers
Scope 1 GHG Type
Unit
Quantity
CO2 Metric tonnes 0
CH4 Metric tonnes 0
CH4 Metric tonnes CO2-e 0
N2O Metric tonnes 0
N2O Metric tonnes CO2-e 0
HFCs Metric tonnes 0
HFCs Metric tonnes CO2-e 0
PFCs Metric tonnes 0
PFCs Metric tonnes CO2-e 0
SF6 Metric tonnes 0
SF6 Metric tonnes CO2-e 0

 
10 6 provided information Scope 1 emissions response questions explain reasons plans collecting Scope 1 GHG emissions information future
Symantec does currently report Scope 1 portfolio does include site energy production industrial activities Supply Chain/Manufacturing Symantec currently working vendors encourage GHG emissions reporting reduction

 
information

 
11 Scope 2 Indirect GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(b)(i))
Important note emission factors zero low carbon electricity purchased emissions factor use calculating Scope 2 emissions depends electricity purchase counted calculating grid average emissions factor – supplier Electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor electricity sourced grid electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor Scope 2 emissions calculated using grid average emissions factor company purchases electricity zero low carbon electricity tariff Electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor zero low carbon electricity sourced grid transmitted company electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor specific method generation used provided certificates quantifying GHG related environmental benefits claimed electricity sold passed separately electricity purchased Click instructions previous page answering question 11
answer following questions using Table 5 provide 11 1 Total gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions metric tonnes CO2 e break total gross global Scope 2 emissions 11 2 Country regionPlease provide CDP responses questions 11 1 11 2 years prior current reporting year time answered CDP information request work backwards current reporting year enter data oldest reporting period Table 5 automatically populated dates gave answer 7 1 Table 5 use numbers Use “ Other” option drop menu enter region
Reporting year Q7.1 Start date 01/04/2008
Reporting year Q7.1 End date 31/03/2009
11.1 Total gross global Scope 2 GHG
emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e
163243

11.2 Gross Scope 2 emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e by country or region


 
answer 11 1 automatically carried forward tables 6 7 add country region answer 11 2 press “ Save” end page facilitate better understanding business break total global Scope 2 emissions 11 3 Business divisionand/or11 4 Facility11 3 Business division (only data current reporting year requested)Table 6 use numbers
Business Divisions - Enter names below
Scope 2 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q11.1 163243

 
11 4 Facility (only data current reporting year requested)Table 7 use numbers
Facilities - Enter names below
Scope 2 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q11.1 163243

 
11 5 provided information Scope 2 emissions response questions explain reasons plans collecting Scope 2 GHG emissions information future
NOTE data presented fiscal year 2007 2008 revised 2007 2008 measured Scope 2 CO2 output 1 37 pounds KWh consumed GHG Protocol reported information available time fiscal year 2009 obtained historical information used country specific emissions factors based GHG Protocol clearly define CO2 output began develop standards way Symantec reports effort create consistent reporting section 9 Methodology (CDP6 Q2(a)(iii)) information Fiscal Year 2007Total Global Emissions 41721 CO2e metric tonnes Total MWh electricity purchased consumed 134 370 MWhThe information listed internally externally verified data reported obtained corporate records Fiscal Year 2008Total Global Emissions 119 000 CO2e metric tonnesTotal MWh electricity purchased consumed 197 000 MWhTotal Global Energy Costs 24800000 US$The information listed calculated using GHG Protocol measuring CO2 output 1 37 pounds KWh consumed Fiscal Year 2008 REVISEDTotal Global Emissions 165 669 CO2e metric tonnesTotal MWh electricity purchased consumed 262 428 MWhTotal Global Energy Costs 28 459 796 US$ revised fiscal year 2008 additional data gathered unavailable year revised calculations reflect Greenhouse Gas Protocol calculations associated country emissions factors Fiscal Year 2009Total Global Emissions 163 243 CO2e metric tonnesTotal MWh electricity purchased consumed 261 912 MWhTotal Global Energy Costs 29 760 029 US$The data presented fiscal year calculated using Greenhouse Gas Protocol associated country emissions factors Ireland did use Greenhouse Gas Protocol tool switched utility Airtricity April 2008 http //www airtricity com/ireland/for_your_business/See section 17 Emissions History information

 
information

 
12 Contractual Arrangements Supporting Particular Types Electricity Generation (CDP6 Q2(b)(i) Guidance)
12 1 consider grid average factor used report Scope 2 emissions question 11 does reflect contractual arrangements electricity suppliers (for example purchase electricity using zero low carbon electricity tariff) calculate report contractual Scope 2 figure response question showing origin alternative emission factor information tariff
Fiscal Year 2009 (April 2008) switched local utility Airtricity Ireland http //www airtricity com/ireland/for_your_business/ currently looking investing additional Green Power future

 
12 2 retire certificates (eg Renewable Energy Certificates) associated zero low carbon electricity provide details
applicable

 
information

 
13 Scope 3 Indirect GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(c))
following categories main sources emissions Report emissions metric tonnes CO2 e state methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions Notes question 13When providing answers question 13 deduct offset credits Renewable Energy Certificates net estimated avoided emissions export renewable energy carbon sequestration (including enhanced oil recovery) use goods services Opportunities provide details activities reduce avoid emissions provided information request Carbon dioxide emissions biologically sequestered carbon e g carbon dioxide burning biomass/biofuels reported separately emissions Scopes 1 2 3 relevant report emissions question 15 include nitrous oxide methane emissions biomass/biofuel combustion emissions scopes
13 1 Employee business travelDescribe main sources emissions
NOTE data presented fiscal year 2007 2008 revised revised information includes additional air travel data emission factors Greenhouse Gas Protocol calculations tool/ emissions factors “ CO2 emissions business travel” Version 1 2 August 2005 Fiscal Year 2007 Global Employee Business TravelGlobal Total 46430 CO2e metric tonnesSymantec did analyze sources Scope 3 GHGs presumes activities resulting employee business travel air make majority Scope 3 output information listed internally externally verified data reported obtained corporate records Fiscal Year 2007 REVISED Global Employee Business TravelAPJ 9 242 CO2e metric tonnesEMEA 6 937 CO2e metric tonnesAmericas 61 648 CO2e metric tonnesGlobal Total 77 827 CO2e metric tonnesSymantec did analyzed sources Scope 3 GHGs presumes activities resulting employee business travel air make majority Scope 3 output information listed externally verified revised information include additional air travel data Greenhouse Gas Protocol calculations tool/ emissions factors “ CO2 emissions business travel” Version 1 2 August 2005 Fiscal Year 2008 Global Employee Business TravelGlobal Employee Business Travel 54000 CO2e metric tonnes Symantec did analyzed sources Scope 3 GHGs presumes activities resulting employee business travel air make majority Scope 3 output Fiscal Year 2008 REVISED Global Employee Business TravelAPJ 11 495 CO2e metric tonnesEMEA 8 743 CO2e metric tonnesAmericas 32 848 CO2e metric tonnesGlobal Total 53 086 CO2e metric tonnesSymantec did analyzed sources Scope 3 GHGs presumes activities resulting employee business travel air make majority Scope 3 output information listed externally verified data reported obtained corporate records revised information include additional air travel data Greenhouse Gas Protocol calculations tool/ emissions factors “ CO2 emissions business travel” Version 1 2 August 2005 Fiscal Year 2009 Global Employee Business TravelAPJ 11 218 CO2e metric tonnesEMEA 8 458 CO2e metric tonnesAmericas 25 681 CO2e metric tonnesGlobal Total 45 357 CO2e metric tonnesSymantec did analyzed sources Scope 3 GHGs presumes activities resulting employee business travel air make majority Scope 3 output information listed externally verified data reported obtained corporate records revised information include additional air travel data Greenhouse Gas Protocol calculations tool/ emissions factors “ CO2 emissions business travel” Version 1 2 August 2005 section 17 Emissions History information

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 2 External distribution/logisticsDescribe main sources emissions
Symantec does currently report external distribution/logistics

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 3 Use/disposal company’ s products servicesFor auto manufacture auto component companies – refer additional questions sectors completing question 13 3 main sources emissions
Symantec does currently report use/disposal company’ s products services

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 4 Company supply chainDescribe main sources emissions
Symantec does currently report supply chain

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 5 OtherIf reporting emissions fall categories categorise transferred emissions non transferred emissions (please guidance explanation terms) report transfers input fields non transfers input fields TransfersDescribe main sources emissions
applicable

 
TransfersReport emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
TransfersState methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
Non transfersDescribe main sources emissions

 
Non transfersReport emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
Non transfersState methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 6 provided information categories Scope 3 GHG emissions response questions explain reasons plans collecting Scope 3 indirect emissions information future
applicable

 
information

 
14 Emissions Avoided Use Goods Services (New CDP 2009)
14 1 goods and/or services enable GHG emissions avoided party provide details including estimated avoided emissions anticipated timescale emissions avoided methodology assumptions emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used estimations
Symantec does currently report GHG emissions avoided party encourage vendors report GHG emissions way LEED certification process vendor contracts

 
information

 
15 Carbon Dioxide Emissions Biologically Sequestered Carbon (New CDP 2009)
example carbon dioxide burning biomass/biofuels

 
15 1 provide total global carbon dioxide emissions metric tonnes CO2 biologically sequestered carbon Emissions metric tonnes CO2 use numbers
0

 
information
Symantec does currently report global carbon dioxide emissions biologically sequestered carbon

 
16 Emissions Intensity (CDP6 Q3(b))
16 1 supply financial emissions intensity measurement reporting year combined Scope 1 2 emissions measurement
Symantec does currently report Scope 1 financial emissions intensity measurementFiscal Year 2008Scope 2 Global financial emissions intensity measurement 5 82Fiscal Year 2009Scope 2 Global financial emissions intensity measurement 5 49

 
16 1 1 units example units metric tonnes CO2 e million Yen turnover metric tonnes CO2 e US$ profit metric tonnes CO2 e thousand Euros turnover
section 11 Scope 2 Indirect GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(b)(i))

 
16 1 2 resulting figure Use decimal point necessary use “ ” “ ” e write 15 6 15 6

 
16 2 supply activity related intensity measurement reporting year combined Scope 1 2 emissions measurement
Symantec does currently report resulting figure

 
16 2 1 units e g metric tonnes CO2 e metric tonne output service sector businesses unit service provided
Symantec does currently report activity related intensity measurement units

 
16 2 2 resulting figure Use decimal point necessary use “ ” “ ” e write 15 6 15 6

 
information
Symantec developed intensity targets C02 emissions square foot publically announced trying reduce global carbon emissions 15% end fiscal year 2012

 
17 Emissions History (CDP6 Q2(f))
17 1 emissions reporting year vary significantly compared previous years
Yes 
Scope 2 Scope 3 emissions decreased fiscal years reported Scope 2 comparing fiscal year 2008 2009 showing increase revenue decrease CO2 emissions information leads believe energy reduction initiatives implemented past years Green Power purchased Ireland proof global carbon footprint reduction success future plan utilize sub metering installed end fiscal year 2009 owned sites better manage systems energy used installing motion sensor lighting switches vending machine economizers air monitors reduce energy used lighting general energy consumption HVAC addition LEED efforts mentioned begun decreases energy water waste believe combination current efforts LEED certification projects internal external green education efforts vendors employees investors continue decrease environmental impact Scope 3 Symantec considers fiscal year 2007 base year significantly reduced CO2 emissions 2007 2009 reasons reasons include completed acquisitions 2006 2007 improved tracking mechanism employee education declining economic environment increased environmental awareness overall addition global video conference rooms (Halo Rooms) Symantec introduced HALO Collaboration Studios fiscal year 2009 video conferencing level delivering high definition video images conference participants shared laptop images objects using state art video audio technology April National Business Travel Association (NBTA) awarded corporate social responsibility awards (CSR) Symantec innovative programs initiatives recognize mission objectives NBTA CSR Committee Symantec won direct (travel buyer) category initiatives minimize carbon emissions enhanced video conferencing regional commute reduction program

 
answer 17 1 Yes 17 1 1 Estimate percentage emissions vary compared previous reporting year box accept numerical answers containing decimal point use " " " " e write 10 6 10 6
5 %

 
emissions increased decreased
Decreased 

 
information
Scope 2 3 2008 Total Global Emissions 218 755 CO2e metric tonnes2009 Total Global Emissions 208 600 CO2e metric tonnesOver 2008 2009 decreased CO2 emissions 5%

 
18 External Verification/Assurance (CDP6 Q2(d))
18 1 information reported response questions 10 – 15 externally verified/assured
None of the information provided in response to question 10-15 has been externally verified/assured in whole or in part. Please go to question 18.6. 

 
aid automated analysis responses select responses tick boxes use text box provided tick boxes menu options appropriate

 
18 2 State scope/boundary emissions included verification/assurance exercise

 
use text box scope/boundary emissions included verification/assurance exercise tick box menu options applicable
applicable

 
18 3 State level assurance (eg reasonable limited) given
applicable

 
18 4 Provide copy verification/assurance statement attach copy/copies

 
18 5 Specify standard information verified/assured
applicable

 
18 6 information provided response questions 10 15 verified state plans GHG emissions accounting information externally verified/assured future
applicable

 
information
future EPA’ s Climate Leaders program review Symantec’ s emissions inventory data progress reaching GHG emissions goal addition Symantec receive technical assistance EPA determining organizational operational boundaries identifying appropriate emission factors Symantec’ s industry documenting decisions Inventory Management Plan (IMP) ensure consistency transparency inventory time EPA performs desktop reviews inventory data IMP ensure meet EPA's quality standards conducts risk based site IMP review ensure Management Plan implemented facility level reviews provide assurance EPA implemented GHG data collection management place track progress GHG reduction goal 15% GHG emissions data submitted based Corporate Accounting Reporting Standard developed World Resources Institute (WRI) World Business Council Sustainable Development (WBCSD)

 
19 Data Accuracy (CDP6 Q2(e) – New wording CDP 2009)
19 1 main sources uncertainty data gathering handling calculations e g data gaps assumptions extrapolation metering/measurement inaccuracies gather emissions data select emissions data gathered proceed question 20
Emission data is gathered. 
source uncertainty data externally verified Symantec looking forward working EPA Climate Leaders verify data gathered far corporate GHG emissions Inventory Management Plan (IMP) includes institutional managerial technical arrangements collection data preparation inventory implementation steps manage quality inventory IMP provides systematic process ensuring data quality identifies areas investments likely lead greatest improvement overall inventory quality primary objective IMP ensuring credibility company’ s GHG inventory information

 
19 2 uncertainties affect accuracy reported data percentage terms estimated standard deviation
Symantec does currently report percentage terms estimated standard deviation

 
19 3 Does company report GHG emissions mandatory voluntary scheme (other CDP) requires accuracy assessment
No (Please go to question 20.) 

 
19 3 1 provide scheme

 
19 3 2 provide accuracy assessment GHG emissions reported scheme report delivered
applicable

 
information

 
20 Energy Fuel Requirements Costs (New CDP 2009)
provide following information reporting year Cost purchased energy
20 1 total cost electricity heat steam cooling purchased company

 
Select currency

 
20 1 1 break costs individual energy type Table 8 “ Cost” column accept text use numbers
Energy type
Cost
Currency
 Electricity
 Heat
 Steam
 Cooling

 
Cost purchased fuel20 2 total cost fuel purchased company mobile stationary combustion

 
Select currency

 
20 2 1 breakdown costs individual fuel type Table 9 cost column accept text use numbers
Mobile combustion fuels
Cost
Currency

 
Stationary combustion fuels
Cost
Currency

 
Energy fuel inputsThe following questions designed establish company’ s requirements energy fuel (inputs) note MWh preferred unit answers helps comparability analysis usually associated electricity equally used represent energy content fuels (see CDP2009 Reporting Guidance information conversions MWh) Purchased energy input20 3 company’ s total consumption purchased energy MWh use numbers

 
Purchased self produced fuel input20 4 company’ s total consumption MWh fuels stationary combustion includes purchased fuels biomass self produced fuels relevant use numbers

 
answering question used Higher Heating Values (also known Gross Calorific Values) Lower Heating Values (also known Net Calorific Values) state used calculating answers

 
20 4 1 break total consumption fuels reported answer question 20 4 individual fuel type MWh Table 10 use numbers
Stationary combustion fuels
MWh

 
Energy outputIn question ask information energy MWh generated company fuel uses Comparing energy contained fuel combustion (question 20 4) energy available use combustion indication efficiency combustion processes taking industry sector account 20 5 total energy generated MWh fuels reported question 20 4 use numbers

 
20 6 total MWh renewable energy excluding biomass self generated company use numbers

 
Energy exportsThis question companies export energy surplus requirements example company use electricity combined heat power plant export heat organisation 20 7 percentage energy reported response question 20 5 exported/sold company grid parties use numbers

 
20 8 percentage renewable energy reported response question 20 6 exported/sold company grid parties use numbers

 
information
Symantec does currently report information

 
21 EU Emissions Trading Scheme (CDP6 Q2(g)(i) – New wording CDP 2009)
Electric utilities report allowances emissions using table question EU5 21 1 Does company operate ownership facilities covered EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)
No (Please go to question 22.) 

 
details 21 2 allowances allocated free year Phase II facilities operate (Even wholly facilities number allowances) Table 11 use numbers
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Free allowances metric tonnes CO2

 
21 3 total allowances purchased national auctioning processes period 1 January 2008 31 December 2008 facilities operate (Even wholly facilities total allowances purchased auctions facilities period) Total allowances purchased auction

 
21 4 total CO2 emissions 1 January 2008 31 December 2008 facilities operate (Even wholly facilities total emissions period )Total emissions metric tonnes

 
information

 
22 Emissions Trading (CDP6 Q2(g)(ii) New wording CDP 2009)
Electric utilities read EU6 answering questions
22 1 provide details emissions trading schemes EU ETS company participates likely participate years
We do not participate or anticipate participating in any trading schemes within the next two years. (Please go to question 22.3)  

 
22 2 overall strategy complying schemes required elected participate including EU ETS
Symantec does currently report Emissions Trading

 
information

 
22 Carbon credits
22 3 purchased project based carbon credits
No. (Please go to question 22.5) 

 
indicate credits meet following commitments

 
22 4 Provide details including type unit volume vintage purchased standard/scheme credits verified issued retired (where applicable)
Symantec does currently report Emissions Trading

 
22 5 involved origination project based carbon credits
No. (Please go to question 22.7) 

 
22 6 provide details including • role project(s) • locations technologies involved • standard/scheme projects being/have developed • emissions reductions validated verified • annual volumes generated/projected carbon credits • Retirement method used compliance offsetting
Symantec does currently report Emissions Trading

 
22 7 involved trading allowances EU ETS and/or project based carbon credits separate business activity direct support business activity investment fund management provision offsetting services
No. (Please go to question 23) 

 
22 8 provide details role performed
Symantec does currently report Emissions Trading

 
information

 
Performance
23 Reduction plans & goals (CDP6 Q3(a))
23 1 Does company GHG emissions and/or energy reduction plan place
Yes. (Please go to question 23.3) 

 
23 2 explain aid automated analysis responses select response options using text box just use text box provided options appropriate

 
menu options appropriate answer question using text box
Yes section 17 Emissions History Additionally work closely EPA goal’ s development ensure accepted goal achievable aggressive compared benchmark process include benchmarking analysis conducted EPA compare Symantec’ s goal proposal projected GHG performance sector

 
Goal setting23 3 emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)
Yes. (Please answer the following questions) 

 
23 4 baseline year target(s)
Scope 2 Symantec’ s baseline year fiscal year 2008 Scope 3 baseline year fiscal year 2007 mentioned emission reduction target 15% Fiscal year 2012

 
23 5 emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)
section 23 3 Goal setting information

 
23 6 sources activities target(s) applies
Scope 2 3

 
23 7 period/timescale does target(s) extend
section 23 3 Goal setting information

 
information

 
23 GHG emissions energy reduction activities
23 8 activities undertaking planning undertake reduce emissions/energy use
section 11 Scope 2 Indirect GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(b)(i))

 
information

 
23 Goal evaluation
23 9 benchmarks key performance indicators use assess progress emissions/energy reduction goals set
Symantec tracks emissions reduction progress quarterly internal KPI document

 
information

 
23 Goal achievement
23 10 emissions reductions energy savings associated cost savings achieved date result plan and/or activities described state methodology data sources used calculating reductions savings
Symantec achieve LEED NC Gold certification 2008 Culver City Campus California USA estimated project reduce carbon emissions approximately 2 817 tons year based expected building energy consumption using Department Energy’ s model estimating carbon emission reduction save Symantec approximately $523 585 00 year includes electricity natural gas compared base case designed meet California Title 24 building energy code Symantec continuously searching efficiencies developing energy management best practices implementing LEED initiatives dedicated reducing footprint furthering environmental stewardship

 
23 11 investment required achieve emissions reductions energy savings targets carry activities listed response question 23 8 period investment Table 13 “ Investment number” column accept text use numbers
Emission reduction target/energy saving target or activity
Investment number
Investment currency
Timescale

 
information
section 11 Scope 2 Indirect GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(b)(i))

 
23 Goal planning & investment
Electric utilities read table question EU3 giving details forecasted emissions
23 12 investment required achieve future targets set reduction plan carry activities listed response question 23 8 period expect payback investment Table 14 “ Number” column accept text use numbers
Plan or action
Investment number
Investment currency
Payback

 
23 13 estimate company’ s future Scope 1 Scope 2 emissions years main territories regions operate provide qualitative explanation expected changes impact future GHG emissions possible use table 15 structure answer question alternatively use text box
Symantec working EPA climate leaders develop year plan

 
Scope 1 forecasted emissions Table 15 following units

 
Scope 2 forecasted emissions Table 15 following units

 
Table 15 “ Scope” columns accept text use numbers Type territory region giving data press “ Add Territory/Region” giving global figure instead separate figures regions territories write “ global” box labelled “ Enter territory region” Click sample table
Future reporting years:
End date for year end DD/MM/YYYY
Emission forecasts
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2

 
23 14 estimate company’ s future energy use years main territories regions operate provide qualitative explanation expected changes impact future GHG emissions possible use table 16 structure answer question alternatively use text box

 
Table 16 use numbers Type territory region giving data description data giving e g electricity consumption press “ Add Row” giving global figure instead separate figures regions territories use word “ global” table accept different types units e g units volume mass Click sample table
Future reporting years:
End date for year end DD/MM/YYYY
Energy use estimates for territory/region
Number
Units
Number
Units
Number
Units
Number
Units
Number
Units

 
23 15 explain methodology used estimations assumptions

 
information

 
24 Planning (CDP6 Q3(c))
24 1 factor cost future emissions capital expenditures impact estimated costs investment decisions
Symantec factors cost future emissions capital expenditures LEED Program section 5 Physical Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(ii)) information Goal achievement 23 10 estimated impacts planned capital budgets investment decisions

 
information

 
Governance
25 Responsibility (CDP6 Q4(a))
25 1 Does Board Committee executive body overall responsibility climate change
Yes. (Please answer question 25.3 and 25.4) 

 
25 2 state overall responsibility climate change managed indicate highest level company responsibility climate change
Yes Symantec Board Directors Nominating Governance Committee oversight climate change Symantec's Corporate Responsibility initiative Symantec CEO reviews status environmental policies programs quarterly set targets goals Overall responsibility climate change managed Environmental Stewardship Committee Senior level representatives Packaging Travel Global Facilities Management make committee CEO Chairman highest level individual responsibility climate change company

 
25 3 Board Committee executive body overall responsibility climate change
Board Directors Nominating Governance Committee

 
25 4 mechanism Board executive body reviews company’ s progress status regarding climate change
regular Corporate Responsibility reports

 
information

 
26 Individual Performance (CDP6 Q4(b))
26 1 provide incentives individual management climate change issues including attainment GHG targets
No. (Please go to question 27.1) 

 
26 2 incentives linked monetary rewards
applicable

 
26 3 entitled benefit incentives
applicable

 
information

 
27 Communications (CDP6 Q4(c))
27 1 publish information risks opportunities presented company climate change details emissions plans reduce emissions
Yes

 
indicate following apply provide details and/or link documents copy relevant excerpt 27 2 company’ s Annual Report mainstream filings
Yes 
http //library corporate ir net/library/89/894/89422/items/304505/Symantec2008AnnualReport_Proxy_10 K pdf

 
27 3 Voluntary communications (other CDP) Corporate Social Responsibility reporting
Yes 
Symantec posts corporate climate strategy progress meeting GHG reduction goal external website www symantec com Corporate Responsibility Report quarterly ‘ Sparkler’ newsletter investors external environmental reports Global Facilities Management ‘ Landlord Resume’ document instituted internal communication program educate 17 500 employees approach climate change involve range GHG reduction activities contribute meeting goal

 
information

 
28 Public Policy (CDP6 Q4(d))
28 1 engage policymakers possible responses climate change including taxation regulation carbon trading
Yes 
Yes Symantec recently member Business Innovative Climate Energy Policy group (BICEP) BICEP urging Congress adopt national renewable portfolio standard RPS requiring 20 percent U S electricity generated wind solar renewable resources 2020

 
information

 
Electric Utilities
EU1 Capacity
Click read instructions answering questions
company’ s historic forecasted installed nameplate capacity MW country energy source enter numbers Click instructions table works
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2001
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year

 
information

 
EU2 Production
historic forecasted production GWh country energy source Production expressed GWh MWh make numbers manageable enter numbers
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2001
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year

 
information

 
EU3 Absolute Emissions
historic forecasted GHG emissions metric tonnes CO2 e country fuel type enter numbers
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2001
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year

 
information

 
EU4 Emission Intensities
historic forecasted GHG emissions intensities metric tonnes CO2 e/MWh country fuel type table accept numerical answers containing decimal point use " " " " e write 10 6 10 6
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2001
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year

 
information

 
EU5 Emission allowances companies EU Emissions Trading Scheme
historic forecasted position emissions emission allowances (EUAs) Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) Emission Reduction Units (ERUs) metric tonnes CO2 country
Phase I
(2005-2007)
Phase II
(2008-2012)
2005 - 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012

 
information

 
EU6 Emission allowances companies significant operations outside EU installations covered emissions trading regimes
historic forecasted position emissions emission allowances offsets metric tonnes CO2 CO2 e appropriate trading scheme Data provided trading scheme company significant participation (i e covers operations lead 5% total company emissions) table appropriate trading scheme participate supply data suitable format exclude voluntary offsets enter numbers
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
Select units: Metric Tonnes CO2 or CO2-e

 
information

 
Auto Sector
AU1 0 Sales volumes (to answered auto manufacturers)
Click read instructions answering questions
Auto manufacturers provide overview historic current planned sales volumes fuel type/engine technology possible region vehicle type guidance standard definitions vehicle segmentation regions sales figures thousands vehicles e g 38 000 vehicles sold entered “ 38” tables
AU1 1 Sales gas/petrol vehiclesPlease enter numbers sales figures thousands vehicles e g 38 000 vehicles sold entered “ 38” tables
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009 estimated
y/e 2010 estimated
y/e 2011 estimated
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
USA Total
Of which Passenger cars total
Of which Two-seaters
Sedans mini-compact
Sedans sub-compact
Sedans compact
Sedans mid-size
Sedans large
Station wagon small
Station wagons mid-size
Station wagons large
Of which Light trucks & SUVs total
Of which Pick-up
Van
SUV
Others
W. EUrope Total
Of which Segment A-B
Segment C
Segment D
Segment E-F
Others
Japan Total
Of which Large
Standard
Small
Mini
China Total
India Total
Brazil Total
Russia Total
CEE Total
Other Total
TOTAL

 
AU1 1 1 Companies provide explanation different vehicle segmentation used data unavailable commercially sensitive

 
AU1 2 Sales diesel vehiclesPlease enter numbers sales figures thousands vehicles e g 38 000 vehicles sold entered “ 38” tables
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009 estimated
y/e 2010 estimated
y/e 2011 estimated
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
USA Total
Of which Passenger cars
Light trucks & SUVs
W. Europe Total
Of which Segment A-B
Segment C
Segment D
Segment E-F
Others
Japan Total
China Total
India Total
Brazil Total
Russia Total
CEE Total
Other Total
TOTAL

 
AU1 2 1 Companies provide explanation different vehicle segmentation used data unavailable commercially sensitive

 
AU1 3 Sales alternatively powered vehiclesThis category includes vehicles powered Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fuel cells compressed air electricity hybrids enter numbers sales figures thousands vehicles e g 38 000 vehicles sold entered “ 38” tables
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009 estimated
y/e 2010 estimated
y/e 2011 estimated
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
USA Total
W. Europe Total
Japan Total
China Total
India Total
Brazil Total
Russia Total
CEE Total
Other Total
TOTAL

 
AU1 3 1 Companies provide explanation different vehicle segmentation used data unavailable commercially sensitive

 
information

 
AU2 0 CO2 emissions vehicles sold (to answered auto manufacturers)
Investors realise emissions indicators vary country country expect auto manufacturers provide historical projected CO2 emissions (in gCO2/Km gCO2/mile) refer guidance conversion factors fuel economy CO2 emissions
AU2 1 explain historic anticipated changes CO2 emissions profile vehicles sold (e g introduction clean technologies changes sales mix) time period 2002 2013

 
AU2 2 explain methodology used calculate CO2 emissions vehicles sold differences data published industry associations governmental agencies methodologies used Environmental Protection Agency adapted driving cycles 2007 companies indicate historical data average CAFE recalculated using new driving cycles (Reformed CAFE) generally companies encouraged provide comparable data time indicate changing methods

 
AU2 3 Sales weighted CO2 emissions gas/petrol powered vehicles sales weight figures ask companies add CO2 emissions gCO2/Km gCO2/mile vehicle sold type divide total number vehicles type Enter figure corresponding units table Use decimal point necessary use “ ” “ ” e write 150 6 150 6
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
Select units: gCO2/km or gCO2/mile
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009 estimated
y/e 2011 estimated
y/e 2013 estimated
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
USA Total
Of which Passenger cars total
Of which Two-seaters
Sedans mini-compact
Sedans sub-compact
Sedans compact
Sedans mid-size
Sedans large
Station wagon small
Station wagons mid-size
Station wagons large
Of which Light trucks & SUVs total
Of which Pick-up
Van
SUV
Others
W. EUrope Total
Of which Segment A-B
Segment C
Segment D
Segment E-F
Others
Japan Total
Of which Large
Standard
Small
Mini
China Total
India Total
Brazil Total
Russia Total
CEE Total
Other Total
TOTAL

 
AU2 3 1 Companies provide explanation different vehicle segmentation used data unavailable commercially sensitive

 
AU2 4 Sales weighted CO2 emissions diesel powered vehicles Use decimal point necessary use “ ” “ ” e write 150 6 150 6
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
Select units: gCO2/km or gCO2/mile
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009 estimated
y/e 2011 estimated
y/e 2013 estimated
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
USA Total
Of which Passenger cars
Light trucks & SUVs
W. Europe Total
Of which Segment A-B
Segment C
Segment D
Segment E-F
Others
Japan Total
China Total
India Total
Brazil Total
Russia Total
CEE Total
Other Total
TOTAL

 
AU2 4 1 Companies provide explanation different vehicle segmentation used data unavailable commercially sensitive

 
information

 
AU3 0 Clean technologies (for auto manufacturers equipment suppliers)
Auto manufacturers provide percentage number new vehicles equipped technologies listed table (Please note table ask enter numbers units thousand e 38000 38 use punctuation spacing Write 38000 38 000 38 000 ) Equipment suppliers provide percentage sales technology
Auto manufacturers indicate providing

 
AU3 1 Clean technologies (for auto manufacturers equipment suppliers)Please enter numbers wish data technology listed type box “ Enter type” select category appear e ICE hybrids zero emissions transmission body (if previous categories appropriate) select “ Add other”
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2008
y/e 2013 estimated
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
 ICE  Reduced friction loss
   Improving Direct Injection
   Downsizing with turbo charge
   Variable valve timing/control
   Optimised/Advanced cooling circuit
   Exhaust heat recovery
   Flexfuel (>B20: > E30)
 HYBRIDS  Start-& Stop
   Start & stop & regenerative braking
   Mild hybrid (motor assisted)
   Full hybrid (electric drive)
 ZERO EMISSIONS  Full electric
   Hydrogen fuel cell
   Compressed air
 TRANSMISSION  Optimised gearbox ratios
   Piloted gearbox
   Dual-clutch
 BODY  Improved aerodynamic efficiency
   Weight reduction
 OTHERS  Low rolling resistance tyres
   Advanced after-treatment

 
AU3 1 1 Companies provide explanation data provided according proposed nomenclature unavailable commercially sensitive

 
information

 
We have upgraded our website login. If you have registered to view CDP responses before December 23, please re-register and we will issue new login details.
  Join the CDP LinkedIn group Follow @cdp on Twitter          Subscribe to receive our monthly newsletter
  Connect with us          Newsletter
   
 
 
  © 2014 CARBON DISCLOSURE PROJECT, Registered Charity no. 1122330.
A company limited by guarantee registered in England no. 05013650