Search Results

 

You need to login or register to view this content

All our reports and results are available free of charge personal use, and/or non-commercial use, however, you must first register with us to view our data.

View full Terms and Conditions



Log In

Respondent CDP 2009: Societe Generale

General introduction


Risk and Opportunities
1 Regulatory Risks (CDP6 1(a)(i))
1 1 company exposed regulatory risks related climate change
We consider our company to be exposed to regulatory risks. 
banking sector concerned wave European Union Emissions Trading scheme Socié té Gé né rale watchful regulations adopted governments (as planned UK) financial services division Socié té Gé né rale activities equipment finance asset leasing management operational vehicle leasing fleet management impacted new regulations energy performance CO2 emissions restriction Theses regulatory risks isolation modify strategy product offers Socié té Gé né rale CSR contributors operate sustainable development watch geographical area business (financing insurance investment retail banking… ) Socié té Gé né rale particular present working groups professional organizations FBF MEDEF (French business confederation) AFEP involved think tank (Epe ORSE BiTC) order informed main lines term regulations legal department operates issues climate change watch order compliant regulations hand Socié té Gé né rale supports Green Paper launched UNEP FI needed mobilise finance sector battle climate change

 
information

 
2 Physical Risks (CDP6 1(a)(ii))
2 1 company exposed physical risks climate change
We consider our company to be exposed to physical risks. 
businesses international company Socié té Gé né rale located 82 countries 163 082 employees work large number branches buildings SG located areas impacted strongly IPCC Socié té Gé né rale aims decrease adapt physical risks June 2008 working group set examine define body environmental standards specific Socié té Gé né rale integrated Group's real estate policy real estate managers single coherent practical reference tool purpose reference framework develop shared coherent culture responsible real estate management Group entities worldwide constantly new ways limit energy consumption instance branch built high environmental criteria French Polynesia working group investigating measures encourage eco friendly behavior staff particularly comes consumables sorting waste water electricity consumption aim ensure individual takes responsibility environmental footprint Accordingly member staff Group departments relocated new Granite tower half 2009 given welcome pack brochure different environmentally friendly actions new work space Business Continuity Plan Societe Generale Group implemented Business Continuity Plan (BCP) involves development adequate organizational structures procedures resources enable Socié té Generale's entities deal natural/accidental disasters acts willful damage order protect employees assets key activities ensure continuation essential services ultimately resumption normal activities Business Continuity Plan (BCP) function attached operational Risk function committed constantly improving Group’ s business continuity plans tests regular basis January 2007 Crisis Management function detached BCP function order strengthen incorporation specific issue Group implementation appropriate tools measures Furthermore unified set procedures tools methodologies implemented enables Group better identify evaluate (both quantitatively qualitatively) manage operational risk based notably Risk Control Self Assessment aim according specific regulations identify evaluate Group’ s exposure different operational risks order map (inherent risks residual risks e having taken account quality risk prevention control systems) Key Risk Indicators KRIs provide alerts risks operational losses scenario analyses consist estimating infrequent severe potential losses Group exposed data collection analysis internal losses losses incurred banking industry basis Group’ s various entities able define implement necessary actions ensure operational risk maintained reduced acceptable level

 
information

 
3 Risks (CDP6 1(a)(iii))
3 1 company exposed risks result climate change
We consider our company to be exposed to other risks. 
risks inherent banking activities necessary taken account inception transaction trough completion climatic damages linked extreme weather events changes weather patterns resource shortages globally taken account risk assessment expertise environmental consulting engineers internal consulting engineers design specific tools assessment CSR concerns assist operational staff use “ Environment” guides listing main environmental risks sector activity internal environmental questionnaire serves diagnosis tool analysis loan applications corporate investment banking division Socié té Gé né rale launched Finethic initiative aims increasing extent environmental social criteria factored Group's sector financing policy coordination different processes objectives member working group Finethic define methodology order calculate CO2 impacts projects financed

 
information

 
4 Regulatory Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(i))
4 1 regulatory requirements climate change present opportunities company
Regulatory requirements present opportunities for my company. 
official European declarations reasons think CO2 regulations tool mitigating European emissions Orbeo joint venture equally owned Rhodia Socié té Gé né rale covers carbon value chain leading buyers sellers CO2 products Orbeo’ s trading marketing skills combined exceptional portfolio emission reduction projects wide geographic presence allow cover carbon products offer wide innovative range services know develop register monitor Kyoto projects contribute market efficiency liquidity transparency innovative customised solutions meet types customers needs (industrials governments investors voluntary buyers) Orbeo ranked 1st categories (Best dealer EUA EUA options Primary CERs Secondary CERs) 2009 annual Energy Commodity Rankings published Risk Energy Risk 18th June 2009 Orbeo announced signing agreements purchase OneCarbon International BV Econcern Group subsidiary OneCarbon international company generates high quality carbon credits originating developing developing financing projects reduce greenhouse gas emissions acquisition reinforce Orbeo’ s carbon offset sourcing activity allow extend service offer emission reduction project developers owners Thanks experienced multi disciplinary teams extended geographical presence Orbeo develop products services carbon value chain (See information website http //csr socgen com/Home page/Placing CSR heart business/Corporate Investment Banking/Responding climate change/orbeo 2008Orbeo signs agreements purchase OneCarbon http //www orbeo com/IMG/pdf/Press_Release_ORBEO OneCarbon_ENGLISH_FINAL_090618 pdf

 
information

 
5 Physical Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(ii))
5 1 physical changes resulting climate change present opportunities company
We don’t know the answer to this question. 
bank Societe Generale support development economy adapt opportunity resulting climate change

 
information

 
6 Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(iii))
6 1 Does climate change present opportunities company
Climate change presents other opportunities for my company. 
comments orbeo (www orbeo com)Our retail banking division France distributes range loan products (Sustainable development saving accounts / loans) customers financing “ green” equipment property offers wide array efficient direct remote banking services avoids need bank paper consumption (at end 2008 600 000 French customers subscribed electronic bank statement service) activities operations developing countries (Africa Asia Eastern Europe) helping economic players regions invest modern infrastructures technologies industrial tools enable path economic development based low carbon consumption strategies adapt climate change Gaselys (www gaselys com) joint venture created SG CIB Gaz France proposes customers resort green certificates order carbon neutral electricity consumption Gaselys operates European energy markets ranks market players gas traded markets developing power business (oil natural gas electricity coal carbon emissions) Societe Generale Group active France abroad financing environmental protection involves windmills strong position solar energy reprocessing energy processing waste clean transport reforestation projects emerging countries Ø EUR 1 6 billion “ green” financing granted 2008 CSR website describes greens loans http //csr socgen com/Home page/Placing CSR heart business/Corporate Investment Banking/Serving green solidarity economiesSocié té Gé né rale continued finance projects tied renewable electricity 2008 particularly wind solar powered electricity year Group financed new wind energy projects destined generate total 188 MW (essentially France) projects financed entirely Socié té Gé né rale include Bassigny Plateau Langres (Haute Marne) wind farms developed Poweo bank refinancing 4 wind farms set Iberdrola Renovables France Italy Socié té Gé né rale financed EDF EN's Minervino project generates 52 MW energy Spain participated financing acquisition portfolio 14 operational wind farms FCC Socié té Gé né rale participated financing number solar energy projects Projects financed 2008 generate 228 MW energy represent total commitment € 174 million bank projects primarily located Spain include 50MW concentrated solar power projects developed Abengoa financing portfolio projects Isolux Group generate 120 MW solar power energy bank financed 8MW portfolio developed Deutsche Bank Principal Finance Italy M& Private Equity business lines actively involved creation development new energy environmental players financial SRI analysis teams experts dealing issues impact external environmental aspects carbon prices valuation players different economic sectors constantly seeking better understand long term issues climate change materialize valuations order recommend anticipatory stock market strategies investor customers Group’ s asset managers regularly extend ranges “ green” financial products offering example individual professional investors SG CIB doing certificates (http //www sgbourse fr/nc/dynamiciframes/damsglieniframe/pdfdynamique/brochure geres/) replicate environmental sector indexes (renewable energies solar energies water bio energies sector) non financial rating agencies way Socié té Gé né rale Index launched April 2008 SGI Global Carbon new equity index based stocks lowest carbon intensity index range environment indexes built par Socié té Gé né rale Index (www sgindex com)Our asset management entity SGAM continued enhance SRI range asset classes geographical regions SRI philosophy Ø launch Europe Environment fund thematic SRI investment approach Ø inception purely thematic Global Environment fund terms financial services operational vehicle leasing business line (ALD Automotive) implementing numerous initiatives countries aimed raising customers’ awareness eco driving carries clean vehicle tests 2008 ALD Automotive launched new environmental offer ALD Bluefleet Bluefleet "umbrella" offer regroups "green" products marketed ALD Automotive subsidiaries helps clients identify different environmental products services offer country gives opportunity completely partially offset CO2 emissions fleets Offsetting calculated according contractual mileage (through purchase carbon credits partnership orbeo January 2008) (http //csr socgen com/Home page/Placing CSR heart business/Specialized Financial Services DSFS/ALD Automotive Promoting responsible use vehicles staff customers) Socié té Gé né rale Group defined environmental sponsorship policy based 3 core issues (climate change biodiversity water) sponsorship global reach firmly rooted bank's culture guiding principles coherence delegation synergies innovation 2009 Socié té Gé né rale supported 2 projects managed GERES (http //geres free fr/) Pro Natura (www pronatura org)

 
information

 
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Accounting, Emissions Intensity, Energy and Trading
7 Reporting Year (CDP6 Q2(a)(ii))
Information respond section “ Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)” developed World Resources Institute World Business Council Sustainable Development (“ GHG Protocol” ) http //www ghgprotocol org/ ISO 14064 1 compatible GHG Protocol number regional/national programme protocols information http //www ghgprotocol org/ use guidance button provide CDP responses questions 7 8 9 10 1 10 2 11 1 11 2 years prior current reporting year time answered CDP information request work backwards current reporting year enter data oldest reporting period Questions 10 1 10 2 11 1 11 2 subsequent webpages dates answer question 7 carried forwards automatically populate webpages
7 1 state start date end date year reporting GHG emissions
Start date 01 January 2008End date 31 December 2008

 
8 Reporting Boundary (CDP6 Q2(a)(i)) 8 1 indicate category describes company entities group Scope 1 Scope 2 GHG emissions reported
Companies over which operational control is exercised. 

 
8 2 state parts business sources GHG emissions excluded reporting boundary
2008 perimeter data collection extended thanks better implication entities reporting Group decided exclude Rosbank perimeter Rosbank recently acquired size integration complex quickly Socié té Gé né rale estimates 134 884 occupants covered reporting process represent 94% employees excluding Rosbank environmental data number occupants specified category Scope 1 following list shows minor emissions taken account insignificant regarding Socié té Gé né rale’ s activities CH4 combustion N2O combustion CH4 natural gas leaks Direct emissions car leasing activities ALD (the Group subsidiary specialized car leasing activities) taken account related external leasing Emissions related car leasing activities internal employees integrated Scope 3 Scope 2 emission source excluded Scope 3 following list shows minor emissions taken account insignificant regarding Socié té Gé né rale’ s activities GHG emissions Group consumption raw materials (except paper) GHG emissions production electronics used Socié té Gé né rale (desktop printers data centres… ) GHG emissions production furniture used Socié té Gé né rale GHG emissions construction activities GHG emissions end life wastes generated Socié té Gé né rale

 
9 Methodology (CDP6 Q2(a)(iii)) 9 1 process used company calculate Scope 1 Scope 2 GHG emissions including standard protocol methodology used collect activity data calculate Scope 1 Scope 2 GHG emissions provide answer text box addition description relevant select methodology list published methodologies aid automated analysis data
calculate CO2 emissions GHG Protocol methodology used Socié té Gé né rale order calculate emissions based reporting tool Planethic Reporting tool collects consolidates social environmental sponsorship data data related sustainability issues different activities Group methodology calculating GHG emissions inventories based emission factors (EF) expressing total CO2 emitted process (combustion trips … ) related global units (KWh Km … ) global units base bills declaration estimates (see 19 1)CO2 emissions = Number Units (KWh Km… ) Í EF (Kg CO2 / unit)The emission factors used calculation national emission communicated UNFCCC factors used frame CO2 emissions certification set European Directive EU ETS Fuel Emission factors(T CO2/TJ PCI) Emission factors(g CO2/kWh PCI)Natural Gas 57 205 2Liquefied natural gas 57 205 2Unrefined fuel consumption 78 280 8Heating oil consumption 75 270CO2 emission factors fuel Electricity Indirect CO2 emissions related electricity production consumed Socié té Gé né rale based consumption country expressed KWh CO2 emission factors country electricity heating electricity consumption country extracted tool Planethic reporting emissions factors 2008 given International Energy Agency (IEA)

 
Select methodologies
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)


 
provide

 
9 2 Details assumptions
data missing assumptions considering data previous year average data square meter occupant previous years data period concerned month yearly basis period missing consider average 11 months missing

 
9 3 names links calculation tools used
implemented reporting tool developed Ivalua Planethic Reporting (http //csr socgen com/content/view/full/372)

 
Select calculation tools
GHG Protocol - CO2 emissions from business travel 1.2 August 2005
GHG Protocol - CO2 emissions from fuel use in facilities 3.0 March 2008
GHG Protocol - Indirect CO2 emissions from purchased electricity 3.0 March 2008
Indicia from Ivalua


 
9 4 global warming potentials applied origin
global warming potentials applied IPCC

 
9 5 emission factors applied origin
used data provided GHG Protocol website externally produced steam superheated water steam taken emission communicated energy provider Paris fin enclosed emission factor Table des facteurs d'é missions

 
information

Download attachment
 
10 Scope 1 Direct GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(b)(i))
Instructions question 10 question 11 (following page)When providing answers questions 10 11 deduct offset credits Renewable Energy Certificates net estimated avoided emissions export renewable energy carbon sequestration (including enhanced oil recovery) use goods services Opportunities provide details activities reduce avoid emissions provided information request Carbon dioxide emissions biologically sequestered carbon e g carbon dioxide burning biomass/biofuels reported separately emissions Scopes 1 2 3 relevant report emissions question 15 include nitrous oxide methane emissions biomass/biofuel combustion emissions scopes
answer following questions using Table 1 provide 10 1 Total gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions metric tonnes CO2 ePlease break total gross global Scope 1 emissions 10 2 Country regionPlease provide CDP responses questions 10 1 10 2 years prior current reporting year time answered CDP information request work backwards current reporting year enter data oldest reporting period Table 1 (below) table 5 (Q11 1 11 2) automatically populated dates answer 7 1 Electric utilities report emissions country/region using table question EU3 Table 1 use numbers Use “ Other” option drop menu enter region
Reporting year Q7.1 Start date 01/01/2008
Reporting year Q7.1 End date 31/12/2008
10.1 Total gross global Scope 1 GHG
emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e
37571

10.2 Gross Scope 1 emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e by country or region

AFRICA 5234
EASTERN EUROPE 16752
WESTERN EUROPE 15584
OCEANIA 1

 
answer question 10 1 automatically carried forward tables 2 3 add country region answer 10 2 press “ Save” end page tick box total gross global Scope 1 figure (Q10 1) includes emissions transferred outside reporting boundary (as given answer 8 1) report transfers 13 5

 
facilitate better understanding business break total global Scope 1 emissions 10 3 Business divisionand/or10 4 Facility10 3 Business division (only data current reporting year requested)Table 2 use numbers
Business Divisions - Enter names below
Scope 1 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q10.1 37571
Retail Banking 31273
Global Investment Management Services 583
Specialized Financial Services 960
Corporate Investment Banking 1354
Corporate Divisions 3401

 
10 4 Facility (only data current reporting year requested)Table 3 use numbers
Facilities - Enter names below
Scope 1 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q10.1 37571

 
10 5 break total global Scope 1 GHG emissions metric tonnes gas metric tonnes CO2 e GHG type (Only data current reporting year requested )Table 4 use numbers
Scope 1 GHG Type
Unit
Quantity
CO2 Metric tonnes 37521
CH4 Metric tonnes
CH4 Metric tonnes CO2-e
N2O Metric tonnes
N2O Metric tonnes CO2-e
HFCs Metric tonnes
HFCs Metric tonnes CO2-e
PFCs Metric tonnes
PFCs Metric tonnes CO2-e
SF6 Metric tonnes
SF6 Metric tonnes CO2-e

 
10 6 provided information Scope 1 emissions response questions explain reasons plans collecting Scope 1 GHG emissions information future

 
information

 
11 Scope 2 Indirect GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(b)(i))
Important note emission factors zero low carbon electricity purchased emissions factor use calculating Scope 2 emissions depends electricity purchase counted calculating grid average emissions factor – supplier Electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor electricity sourced grid electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor Scope 2 emissions calculated using grid average emissions factor company purchases electricity zero low carbon electricity tariff Electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor zero low carbon electricity sourced grid transmitted company electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor specific method generation used provided certificates quantifying GHG related environmental benefits claimed electricity sold passed separately electricity purchased Click instructions previous page answering question 11
answer following questions using Table 5 provide 11 1 Total gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions metric tonnes CO2 e break total gross global Scope 2 emissions 11 2 Country regionPlease provide CDP responses questions 11 1 11 2 years prior current reporting year time answered CDP information request work backwards current reporting year enter data oldest reporting period Table 5 automatically populated dates gave answer 7 1 Table 5 use numbers Use “ Other” option drop menu enter region
Reporting year Q7.1 Start date 01/01/2008
Reporting year Q7.1 End date 31/12/2008
11.1 Total gross global Scope 2 GHG
emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e
178440

11.2 Gross Scope 2 emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e by country or region

AFRICA 32935
NORTH AMERICA 10118
SOUTH AMERICA 810
ASIA 7872
EASTERN EUROPE 73268
WESTERN EUROPE 50276
OCEANIA 3161

 
answer 11 1 automatically carried forward tables 6 7 add country region answer 11 2 press “ Save” end page facilitate better understanding business break total global Scope 2 emissions 11 3 Business divisionand/or11 4 Facility11 3 Business division (only data current reporting year requested)Table 6 use numbers
Business Divisions - Enter names below
Scope 2 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q11.1 178440
Retail Banking 120898
Global Investment Management Services 7510
Specialized Financial Services 15376
Corporate Investment Banking 27550
Corporate Divisions 7106

 
11 4 Facility (only data current reporting year requested)Table 7 use numbers
Facilities - Enter names below
Scope 2 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q11.1 178440

 
11 5 provided information Scope 2 emissions response questions explain reasons plans collecting Scope 2 GHG emissions information future

 
information

 
12 Contractual Arrangements Supporting Particular Types Electricity Generation (CDP6 Q2(b)(i) Guidance)
12 1 consider grid average factor used report Scope 2 emissions question 11 does reflect contractual arrangements electricity suppliers (for example purchase electricity using zero low carbon electricity tariff) calculate report contractual Scope 2 figure response question showing origin alternative emission factor information tariff

 
12 2 retire certificates (eg Renewable Energy Certificates) associated zero low carbon electricity provide details
60 GWh Electricity Consumption Green Electricity purchasing green certificates 2005 Socié té Gé né rale tower La Dé fense powered exclusively using 100% green electricity 55 GWh year October 2006 SG Zurich used 100% green electricity 510 MWh April 2008 10% electricity Komerč ní banka (Czech Republic) green electricity 2 2 GWh 2008 Group entities (SG London Gefa Bank Sogessur ) purchased green electricity increasing proportion green electricity Group's global electricity consumption 10 1% (60 GWh) January 2009 Socié té Gé né rale's new Granite tower HQE® (High Environmental Quality) building powered entirely green electricity

 
information

 
13 Scope 3 Indirect GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(c))
following categories main sources emissions Report emissions metric tonnes CO2 e state methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions Notes question 13When providing answers question 13 deduct offset credits Renewable Energy Certificates net estimated avoided emissions export renewable energy carbon sequestration (including enhanced oil recovery) use goods services Opportunities provide details activities reduce avoid emissions provided information request Carbon dioxide emissions biologically sequestered carbon e g carbon dioxide burning biomass/biofuels reported separately emissions Scopes 1 2 3 relevant report emissions question 15 include nitrous oxide methane emissions biomass/biofuel combustion emissions scopes
13 1 Employee business travelDescribe main sources emissions
63 383 T CO2e main source car travel FlightsThe methodology determine CO2 emission factors business trips flights based different emission factors expressed Kg CO2 /passenger Km Distinctions short haul medium haul long haul Short haul long haul emission factors recommended GhG Protocol UK DEFRA Medium haul emission factor GhG Protocol calculation tool defined according previous emission factors factors account differences « economic class » / « business class » passengers equal contribution subsidiaries book journeys Socié té Gé né rale’ s travel agencies total passengers Km category obtained request travel agencies subsidiaries able break global data enter Km ‘ Medium haul’ Flights Kg CO2 e /passenger KmShort haul (< 500 km) 0 1753Medium haul (500 – 1600 km) 0 0983Long haul (> 1600 km) 0 1106Emission factors business trips flights expressed Kg CO2 passenger KmPlease note emission factors account radiating forcing factor usually expressed twice factor emission ground Business trips car (long term / short term lease taxi) order calculate emissions business trips car taxis use total Km different emission factors (Kg CO2/Km) according kind motor (unleaded diesel petrol) power emission factors GhG Protocol calculation tool UK DEFRA total Km obtained request ALD Socié té Gé né rale’ s subsidiary charge long term short term leases car fleet Motor Kg CO2 e / KmPetrole (< 1 4 L) 0 1809Petrole (1 4 – 2 1 L) 0 2139Petrole (> 2 1 L) 0 2958Diesel (< 2 L) 0 16997Diesel (> 2 L) 0 2580Emission factors business trips car expressed Kg CO2/ Km

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e
63 383 T CO2e main source car travel FlightsThe methodology determine CO2 emission factors business trips flights based different emission factors expressed Kg CO2 /passenger Km Distinctions short haul medium haul long haul Short haul long haul emission factors recommended GhG Protocol UK DEFRA Medium haul emission factor GhG Protocol calculation tool defined according previous emission factors factors account differences « economic class » / « business class » passengers equal contribution subsidiaries book journeys Socié té Gé né rale’ s travel agencies total passengers Km category obtained request travel agencies subsidiaries able break global data enter Km ‘ Medium haul’ Flights Kg CO2 e /passenger KmShort haul (< 500 km) 0 1753Medium haul (500 – 1600 km) 0 0983Long haul (> 1600 km) 0 1106Emission factors business trips flights expressed Kg CO2 passenger KmPlease note emission factors account radiating forcing factor usually expressed twice factor emission ground Business trips car (long term / short term lease taxi) order calculate emissions business trips car taxis use total Km different emission factors (Kg CO2/Km) according kind motor (unleaded diesel petrol) power emission factors GhG Protocol calculation tool UK DEFRA total Km obtained request ALD Socié té Gé né rale’ s subsidiary charge long term short term leases car fleet Motor Kg CO2 e / KmPetrole (< 1 4 L) 0 1809Petrole (1 4 – 2 1 L) 0 2139Petrole (> 2 1 L) 0 2958Diesel (< 2 L) 0 16997Diesel (> 2 L) 0 2580Emission factors business trips car expressed Kg CO2/ Km

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions
63 383 T CO2e main source car travel FlightsThe methodology determine CO2 emission factors business trips flights based different emission factors expressed Kg CO2 /passenger Km Distinctions short haul medium haul long haul Short haul long haul emission factors recommended GhG Protocol UK DEFRA Medium haul emission factor GhG Protocol calculation tool defined according previous emission factors factors account differences « economic class » / « business class » passengers equal contribution subsidiaries book journeys Socié té Gé né rale’ s travel agencies total passengers Km category obtained request travel agencies subsidiaries able break global data enter Km ‘ Medium haul’ Flights Kg CO2 e /passenger KmShort haul (< 500 km) 0 1753Medium haul (500 – 1600 km) 0 0983Long haul (> 1600 km) 0 1106Emission factors business trips flights expressed Kg CO2 passenger KmPlease note emission factors account radiating forcing factor usually expressed twice factor emission ground Business trips car (long term / short term lease taxi) order calculate emissions business trips car taxis use total Km different emission factors (Kg CO2/Km) according kind motor (unleaded diesel petrol) power emission factors GhG Protocol calculation tool UK DEFRA total Km obtained request ALD Socié té Gé né rale’ s subsidiary charge long term short term leases car fleet Motor Kg CO2 e / KmPetrole (< 1 4 L) 0 1809Petrole (1 4 – 2 1 L) 0 2139Petrole (> 2 1 L) 0 2958Diesel (< 2 L) 0 16997Diesel (> 2 L) 0 2580Emission factors business trips car expressed Kg CO2/ Km

 
13 2 External distribution/logisticsDescribe main sources emissions
assessed time

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e
assessed time

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions
assessed time

 
13 3 Use/disposal company’ s products servicesFor auto manufacture auto component companies – refer additional questions sectors completing question 13 3 main sources emissions
objectives Finethic member working group define methodology order calculate CO2 impacts projects financed

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 4 Company supply chainDescribe main sources emissions
office paper 14 977 T CO2eTwo emission factors used determine CO2 emissions paper consumption factors expressed T CO2 / T paper (tonnes CO2 tonnes paper) different considering Group consuming classic paper (white non recycled non eco labeled) recycle / eco labeled paper factors study EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Data consumption obtained request purchasing managers suppliers Office paper T C02e / T T CO2e / TWhite paper (non recycled) (100%) 0 56 2 05Recycled (100%) 0 46 1 69Emissions factors paper production expressed T CO2 / T paper

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e
office paper 14 977 T CO2eTwo emission factors used determine CO2 emissions paper consumption factors expressed T CO2 / T paper (tonnes CO2 tonnes paper) different considering Group consuming classic paper (white non recycled non eco labeled) recycle / eco labeled paper factors study EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Data consumption obtained request purchasing managers suppliers Office paper T C02e / T T CO2e / TWhite paper (non recycled) (100%) 0 56 2 05Recycled (100%) 0 46 1 69Emissions factors paper production expressed T CO2 / T paper

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions
office paper 14 977 T CO2eTwo emission factors used determine CO2 emissions paper consumption factors expressed T CO2 / T paper (tonnes CO2 tonnes paper) different considering Group consuming classic paper (white non recycled non eco labeled) recycle / eco labeled paper factors study EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Data consumption obtained request purchasing managers suppliers Office paper T C02e / T T CO2e / TWhite paper (non recycled) (100%) 0 56 2 05Recycled (100%) 0 46 1 69Emissions factors paper production expressed T CO2 / T paper

 
13 5 OtherIf reporting emissions fall categories categorise transferred emissions non transferred emissions (please guidance explanation terms) report transfers input fields non transfers input fields TransfersDescribe main sources emissions

 
TransfersReport emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
TransfersState methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
Non transfersDescribe main sources emissions

 
Non transfersReport emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
Non transfersState methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 6 provided information categories Scope 3 GHG emissions response questions explain reasons plans collecting Scope 3 indirect emissions information future

 
information

 
14 Emissions Avoided Use Goods Services (New CDP 2009)
14 1 goods and/or services enable GHG emissions avoided party provide details including estimated avoided emissions anticipated timescale emissions avoided methodology assumptions emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used estimations

 
information

 
15 Carbon Dioxide Emissions Biologically Sequestered Carbon (New CDP 2009)
example carbon dioxide burning biomass/biofuels

 
15 1 provide total global carbon dioxide emissions metric tonnes CO2 biologically sequestered carbon Emissions metric tonnes CO2 use numbers
0

 
information
relevant Socié té Gé né rale

 
16 Emissions Intensity (CDP6 Q3(b))
16 1 supply financial emissions intensity measurement reporting year combined Scope 1 2 emissions measurement
NET BANKING INCOMEScope 1 = 37 571 / 21 866 = 1 7 T CO2e / M EURScope 2 = 178 441 / 21 866 = 8 1 T CO2e / M EURTotal = 216 012 / 21866 = 9 88 T CO2 / M EUROPERATING INCOMEScope 1 = 37 571 / 3 683 = 10 2 T CO2e / M EURScope 2 = 178 441 / 3 683 = 48 45 T CO2e / M EURTotal = 216 012 / 3 683 = 58 56 T CO2 / M EUR

 
16 1 1 units example units metric tonnes CO2 e million Yen turnover metric tonnes CO2 e US$ profit metric tonnes CO2 e thousand Euros turnover
NET BANKING INCOMEScope 1 = 37 571 / 21 866 = 1 7 T CO2e / M EURScope 2 = 178 441 / 21 866 = 8 1 T CO2e / M EURTotal = 216 012 / 21866 = 9 88 T CO2 / M EUROPERATING INCOMEScope 1 = 37 571 / 3 683 = 10 2 T CO2e / M EURScope 2 = 178 441 / 3 683 = 48 45 T CO2e / M EURTotal = 216 012 / 3 683 = 58 56 T CO2 / M EUR

 
16 1 2 resulting figure Use decimal point necessary use “ ” “ ” e write 15 6 15 6
58.56

 
16 2 supply activity related intensity measurement reporting year combined Scope 1 2 emissions measurement
Total CO2 e emissions occupantScope 1 2 3 = 294 372 T CO2e / 131 162 occ = 2 24 T CO2e occupant Scope 1 = 37 571 T CO2e / 131 162 occ = 0 29 T CO2e occupantScope 2 = 178 441 T CO2e / 131 162 occ = 1 36 T CO2e occupant

 
16 2 1 units e g metric tonnes CO2 e metric tonne output service sector businesses unit service provided
Total CO2 e emissions occupantScope 1 2 3 = 294 372 T CO2e / 131 162 occ = 2 24 T CO2e occupant Scope 1 = 37 571 T CO2e / 131 162 occ = 0 29 T CO2e occupantScope 2 = 178 441 T CO2e / 131 162 occ = 1 36 T CO2e occupant

 
16 2 2 resulting figure Use decimal point necessary use “ ” “ ” e write 15 6 15 6
2.24

 
information

 
17 Emissions History (CDP6 Q2(f))
17 1 emissions reporting year vary significantly compared previous years
Yes 
emissions vary significantly year scope enlarged considering significant external growth Better efforts entities participating environmental reporting New entities participating environmental reporting processà points lead 14 5% increase perimeter terms occupants impacting directly variation emitted emissions 2007 2008

 
answer 17 1 Yes 17 1 1 Estimate percentage emissions vary compared previous reporting year box accept numerical answers containing decimal point use " " " " e write 10 6 10 6
-3.5 %

 
emissions increased decreased

 
information

 
18 External Verification/Assurance (CDP6 Q2(d))
18 1 information reported response questions 10 – 15 externally verified/assured
Yes, it has been externally verified/assured in whole or in part.(Please continue with questions 18.2 to 18.5) 

 
aid automated analysis responses select responses tick boxes use text box provided tick boxes menu options appropriate

 
18 2 State scope/boundary emissions included verification/assurance exercise
Scope 1 Q10.1
Scope 2 Q11.1
Retirement of certificates Q12.2
Scope 3 employee business travel Q13.1


 
use text box scope/boundary emissions included verification/assurance exercise tick box menu options applicable
request Socié té Gé né rale remit Group's statutory auditors Ernst & Young verified Group's global reporting process main CSR data published Information verified indicated italics followed * 2008 Furthermore Socié té Gé né rale chosen apply relevant performance indicators underline importance Group attaches integration social environmental criteria businesses checks carried Ernst & Young confirm Group's adherence indicators question indicated italics followed * 2008 report furnished Ernst & Young available Investors Analysts section website Total gross global GHG emissions metric tonnes CO2e Scope 1 2 3

 
18 3 State level assurance (eg reasonable limited) given
ReasonableSee statutory auditors report CSR indicators data http //csr socgen com/Home page/Investors analysts/Statutory Auditors Report Ernst Young Audit

 
18 4 Provide copy verification/assurance statement attach copy/copies

 
18 5 Specify standard information verified/assured
statutory auditors report CSR indicators data http //csr socgen com/Home page/Investors analysts/Statutory Auditors Report Ernst Young Audit

 
18 6 information provided response questions 10 15 verified state plans GHG emissions accounting information externally verified/assured future

 
information

 
19 Data Accuracy (CDP6 Q2(e) – New wording CDP 2009)
19 1 main sources uncertainty data gathering handling calculations e g data gaps assumptions extrapolation metering/measurement inaccuracies gather emissions data select emissions data gathered proceed question 20
Emission data is gathered. 
calculation data based bills statements information suppliers estimates (please 9 2 Details assumptions methodology estimates )In 2008 variation controls compared year implemented water energy indicators alert message requested contributor check data recorded environmental indicator protocol specifies variation plus minus 40% compared Group average figures accompanied relevant explanation + / 40% variation progressively reduced years order reach better quality relevant analysis data Qualitative criteria (multiple choice questions written comments) integrated Planethic Reporting 2006 order better define different scopes applying data collected Contributors asked note best practices explain discrepancies year improved understanding local practices factors allow greater accuracy data consolidation end campaign Group's Sustainable Development Department performs consistency checks environmental data main entities based Group averages data previous years

 
19 2 uncertainties affect accuracy reported data percentage terms estimated standard deviation
assessed accuracy reported data improving processes

 
19 3 Does company report GHG emissions mandatory voluntary scheme (other CDP) requires accuracy assessment
Yes (Please answer the following questions - 19.3.1, 19.3.2). 

 
19 3 1 provide scheme
Other 
NRE Law Article 2 Decree N° 2002 221 February 20th 2002 enacting article L 225 102 1 French Commercial Code

 
19 3 2 provide accuracy assessment GHG emissions reported scheme report delivered
Registration document 2009 Socié té Gé né rale http //www socgen com/sg//file/fichierig/documentIG_5197/sgregistrationdocument09 pdf

 
information

 
20 Energy Fuel Requirements Costs (New CDP 2009)
provide following information reporting year Cost purchased energy
20 1 total cost electricity heat steam cooling purchased company

 
Select currency

 
20 1 1 break costs individual energy type Table 8 “ Cost” column accept text use numbers
Energy type
Cost
Currency
 Electricity
 Heat
 Steam
 Cooling

 
Cost purchased fuel20 2 total cost fuel purchased company mobile stationary combustion

 
Select currency

 
20 2 1 breakdown costs individual fuel type Table 9 cost column accept text use numbers
Mobile combustion fuels
Cost
Currency

 
Stationary combustion fuels
Cost
Currency

 
Energy fuel inputsThe following questions designed establish company’ s requirements energy fuel (inputs) note MWh preferred unit answers helps comparability analysis usually associated electricity equally used represent energy content fuels (see CDP2009 Reporting Guidance information conversions MWh) Purchased energy input20 3 company’ s total consumption purchased energy MWh use numbers
854234 MWh

 
Purchased self produced fuel input20 4 company’ s total consumption MWh fuels stationary combustion includes purchased fuels biomass self produced fuels relevant use numbers
43299 MWh

 
answering question used Higher Heating Values (also known Gross Calorific Values) Lower Heating Values (also known Net Calorific Values) state used calculating answers

 
20 4 1 break total consumption fuels reported answer question 20 4 individual fuel type MWh Table 10 use numbers
Stationary combustion fuels
MWh
Unrefined fuel oil consumption 0
Heating oil diesel oil consumption 43059

 
Energy outputIn question ask information energy MWh generated company fuel uses Comparing energy contained fuel combustion (question 20 4) energy available use combustion indication efficiency combustion processes taking industry sector account 20 5 total energy generated MWh fuels reported question 20 4 use numbers

 
20 6 total MWh renewable energy excluding biomass self generated company use numbers

 
Energy exportsThis question companies export energy surplus requirements example company use electricity combined heat power plant export heat organisation 20 7 percentage energy reported response question 20 5 exported/sold company grid parties use numbers

 
20 8 percentage renewable energy reported response question 20 6 exported/sold company grid parties use numbers

 
information
activity structure (subsidiaries quite independent paying bills example France branches pay bills energy consumption) Group Socié té Gé né rale position provide accurate data concerning total cost electricity heat steam cooling purchased team charge environmental reporting studying possibility enlarge reporting data financial aspects cost energy (broken renewable non renewable sources) cost using fossil energy instead green energy integrating carbon prices factor

 
21 EU Emissions Trading Scheme (CDP6 Q2(g)(i) – New wording CDP 2009)
Electric utilities report allowances emissions using table question EU5 21 1 Does company operate ownership facilities covered EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)
No (Please go to question 22.) 

 
details 21 2 allowances allocated free year Phase II facilities operate (Even wholly facilities number allowances) Table 11 use numbers
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Free allowances metric tonnes CO2

 
21 3 total allowances purchased national auctioning processes period 1 January 2008 31 December 2008 facilities operate (Even wholly facilities total allowances purchased auctions facilities period) Total allowances purchased auction

 
21 4 total CO2 emissions 1 January 2008 31 December 2008 facilities operate (Even wholly facilities total emissions period )Total emissions metric tonnes

 
information

 
22 Emissions Trading (CDP6 Q2(g)(ii) New wording CDP 2009)
Electric utilities read EU6 answering questions
22 1 provide details emissions trading schemes EU ETS company participates likely participate years
We participate or anticipate participating in trading schemes other than the EU ETS in the next two years. 
subsidiary London (SG London) quotas CO2 emissions according Carbon Reduction Commitment set Department Environment Food Rural Affairs (DEFRA)

 
22 2 overall strategy complying schemes required elected participate including EU ETS
defined carbon plan reduction slogan "Eviter – Compenser – Ré duire" (Avoid – Offset – Reduce) Group's carbon neutrality project based core pillars plan reduce greenhouse gas emissions includes definition best practices construction work travel resources paper consumption drawing action plans reduction targets years specific Group's different business lines consideration target reductions CO2 emissions approving Group projects study feasibility implementing internal penalties incite different business lines manage emissions effectively (over course 2009) payment Group costs incurred voluntary offsetting carbon emissions year deemed essential order underline commitment (for central services departments France) constant upgrading reporting systems order improve scope accuracy data available study feasibility measuring consumption fluids real time planned 2009 mechanism offset carbon emissions purchase emission credits (notably subsidiary orbeo major player carbon emissions market Europe) involvement Group's entities divisions according individual objectives Permanent communication initiatives heighten staff awareness importance climate change carbon economy (via organisation events France world Poznan Conference) highlight report successful initiatives place (SGBT Euro VL Luxembourg Komerč ní banka Green electricity) Resources mobilisedSocié té Gé né rale Group mobilised technical human resources alike ensure success carbon plan include dedicated supervisory committee regroups Heads Sustainable Development entities divisions role oversee implementation Group's plan report concrete progress transverse Environment unit coordinate different measures ensure decision makers operational staff share information need data collection tool Planethic© Reporting set 2005 record Group's consumption energy water raw materials waste generated scope (94% Group's payroll excluding Rosbank) accuracy data collected constantly improved

 
information

 
22 Carbon credits
22 3 purchased project based carbon credits
Yes. (Please answer the following questions) 

 
indicate credits meet following commitments
Primarily for voluntary offsetting of your own emissions


 
22 4 Provide details including type unit volume vintage purchased standard/scheme credits verified issued retired (where applicable)
Allowance Type Certified Emission Reduction issued following Clean Development Mechanism Project Gonzá lez Catá n Ensenada Landfill Gas Project registered CDM Project CDM Executive Board 17 July 2006 number 0426 Number Allowances 26 842 00 buildings Paris area2 131 Socié té Gé né rale Bank & Trust (SGBT) Euro VL LuxembourgTotal (28 840) voluntary canceled

 
22 5 involved origination project based carbon credits
No. (Please go to question 22.7) 

 
22 6 provide details including • role project(s) • locations technologies involved • standard/scheme projects being/have developed • emissions reductions validated verified • annual volumes generated/projected carbon credits • Retirement method used compliance offsetting
2008 orbeo continued grow global carbon markets 2008 selected market maker futures contracts Canadian carbon dioxide equivalent units (CO2e) Montreal Climate Exchange * market maker BlueNext futures European Union Allowances orbeo company trade CER options ECX market using ICE electronic platform trading activities new products orbeo contributing development global liquid environment market reliable fair carbon price signal use means assessing value future industrial investments terms origination projects signed 2008 example Emission Reduction Purchase Agreement signed Cameroonian company Hysacam (Hygiè ne et Salubrité du Cameroun) specialises waste treatment Based retrieval gas emitted landfill Cameroon project avoid emission 400 000 tons CO2 2012 create 200 jobs * project expected recognised Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) July 2009 mechanism orbeo committed promoting Africa Projects reduction greenhouse gases begun emerging countries China result orbeo able expand geographic reach process signing Emission Reduction Purchase Agreements Latin America Asia Africa 2008 saw orbeo joined forces Rhodia Japan new transaction NEDO (the Japanese government agency responsible CER purchase program set respect country's Kyoto objectives) covering total 7 939 million tons CERs 2008 2013 – e 48% volumes purchased Japanese government April 1 2007 March 31 2008 orbeo developing sale primary carbon credits (CER) selling NEFCO (the international finance institution set Nordic countries) CERs small hydraulic plant China (www orbeo com + http //csr kinoadev com/Home page/Placing CSR heart business/Corporate Investment Banking/Responding climate change/orbeo 2008)

 
22 7 involved trading allowances EU ETS and/or project based carbon credits separate business activity direct support business activity investment fund management provision offsetting services

 
22 8 provide details role performed

 
information

 
Performance
23 Reduction plans & goals (CDP6 Q3(a))
23 1 Does company GHG emissions and/or energy reduction plan place
Yes. (Please go to question 23.3) 

 
23 2 explain aid automated analysis responses select response options using text box just use text box provided options appropriate

 
menu options appropriate answer question using text box
Goal setting

 
Goal setting23 3 emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)
Yes. (Please answer the following questions) 

 
23 4 baseline year target(s)
base line 2007

 
23 5 emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)
main target 11% CO2 emissions occupant order achieve target Group working targets energy business trips paper consumption reduction

 
23 6 sources activities target(s) applies
Energy consumption office paper business travel Group level

 
23 7 period/timescale does target(s) extend
baseline target 2007 target extend 5 years 2008 2012

 
information

 
23 GHG emissions energy reduction activities
23 8 activities undertaking planning undertake reduce emissions/energy use
Group presently undertaking major programs Green program climate protection policy Group program aims reduce CO2 emissions use new technology improve Group’ s carbon footprint Green initiative launched Group's Information Systems Division (DSI) Sustainable Development Department aims reduce CO2 emissions use technology order improve environmental footprint Socié té Gé né rale Group activities accounts close half Group's electricity consumption close quarter CO2 emissions figures means unusual major banks adopting new measures limit impact environment Socié té Gé né rale taken step analysis maturity systems subcontractor second half 2008 subcontractor’ s audit highlights core priorities o optimisation production centres o reduction environmental impact office equipment o development remote working resources web conferencing video conferencing teleworking aim priorities o substantially reduce consumption electricity systems resources o significantly reduce level CO2 emissions employee o generate savings notably respect Group's energy transport expenses Carbon action plans plans aim entity indications concerning environmental targets according environmental profile performances compared Group average banking activity average targets business activity targets set order reach CO2 emissions reduction goal ( 11% 2012) finalized plans targets defined entity enable Group set global targets energy paper consumption business trips reduction targets Company Travel Plan Nantes (see CSR website http //csr socgen com/content/view/full/259)

 
information

 
23 Goal evaluation
23 9 benchmarks key performance indicators use assess progress emissions/energy reduction goals set
Benchmarks targets best practices regularly set according internal external approaches external comparisons banks Internal comparisons different entities Group environment KPI (Key Performance Indicators) compare data (KWh tonnes Km) CO2 emissions occupant real consumptions (energy paper) real business trip simulation according goals set yearly basis Energy data analyzed square meters environmental team seriously considering necessity establish analysis based constant perimeter order evaluate efficiently energetic management process results note yearly based goals energy paper business trips defined Carbon action plans able use KPI 2009 reporting data

 
information

 
23 Goal achievement
23 10 emissions reductions energy savings associated cost savings achieved date result plan and/or activities described state methodology data sources used calculating reductions savings
improvement reporting process definition targets Carbon action plans able measure environmental energy savings considering necessity reach accurate level analysis environmental thinking implementing like like perimeter basis order evaluate process results (see 23 9)

 
23 11 investment required achieve emissions reductions energy savings targets carry activities listed response question 23 8 period investment Table 13 “ Investment number” column accept text use numbers
Emission reduction target/energy saving target or activity
Investment number
Investment currency
Timescale

 
information
actions implemented Paper global tenders paper supply Europe recycled eco labeled paper servers virtualized order save energy (virtual Desktop allowing multiple desktops hosting single server) servers gathered place order better manage energy consumption optimization development program enabling PC hibernate turned standby mode automatically Buildings o energetic audit energy efficiency works branches o Use renewable energy brancheso Building Management (BMS) implemented premises enabling Group save energy Paper new printer print sides page Trips new Group policy travel states employees traveling cities (Paris London Paris Brussels Paris Amsterdam Paris Stuttgart Paris Luxemburg Paris Geneva … ) travel train rule applies trips French city Trips online eco comparison tool raise staff awareness

 
23 Goal planning & investment
Electric utilities read table question EU3 giving details forecasted emissions
23 12 investment required achieve future targets set reduction plan carry activities listed response question 23 8 period expect payback investment Table 14 “ Number” column accept text use numbers
Plan or action
Investment number
Investment currency
Payback

 
23 13 estimate company’ s future Scope 1 Scope 2 emissions years main territories regions operate provide qualitative explanation expected changes impact future GHG emissions possible use table 15 structure answer question alternatively use text box
Carbon action plans finalized financial investments provided Estimation Scope 1 2 data deducted offset credits Renewable Energy Certificates net estimated avoided emissions export renewable energy provided Reporting management tool PROJECTIONS 2009 2010 2011 2012CO2 emissions occupant Scope 1 + 2 + 3 2 18 2 14 2 10 2 06Variation 2 50% 2% 2% 2%CO2 emissions occupant Scope 1 + 2 1 63 1 57 1 51 1 46Variation 1 02% 3 74% 3 72% 3 73%GLOBAL TONNES CO2 AFRICA 37 780 36 367 35 014 33 708NORTH AMERICA 10 015 9 640 9 282 8 935SOUTH AMERICA 802 772 743 715ASIA 7 792 7 500 7 221 6 952EASTERN EUROPE 89 102 85 769 82 579 79 499WESTERN EUROPE 65 188 62 750 60 416 58 162OCEANIA 3 130 3 013 2 901 2 792TOTAL 213 808 205 811 198 155 190 764These projections estimation general commitment CO2 emission occupant reduction goals vary region follow o 10% Greeceo 11% Franceo 15 % Czech Republico 17% UKo 3% – 4% subsidiaries USA

 
Scope 1 forecasted emissions Table 15 following units

 
Scope 2 forecasted emissions Table 15 following units

 
Table 15 “ Scope” columns accept text use numbers Type territory region giving data press “ Add Territory/Region” giving global figure instead separate figures regions territories write “ global” box labelled “ Enter territory region” Click sample table
Future reporting years:
End date for year end DD/MM/YYYY 31/12/2009 31/12/2010 31/12/2011 31/12/2012
Emission forecasts
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
AFRICA 37780 36367 35014 33708
NORTH AMERICA 10015 9640 9282 8935
SOUTH AMERICA 802 772 743 715
ASIA 7792 7500 7221 6952
EASTERN EUROPE 89102 85769 82579 79499
WESTERN EUROPE 65188 62750 60416 58162
OCEANIA 3130 3013 2901 2792

 
23 14 estimate company’ s future energy use years main territories regions operate provide qualitative explanation expected changes impact future GHG emissions possible use table 16 structure answer question alternatively use text box
OCCUPANT 2009 2010 2011 2012Energy consumption (KWh) 6 288 6 059 5 839 5 627VARIATION 3% 4% 4% 4%Electricity(KWh) 4 203 4 063 3 928 3 802VARIATION 3% 3% 3% 3%

 
Table 16 use numbers Type territory region giving data description data giving e g electricity consumption press “ Add Row” giving global figure instead separate figures regions territories use word “ global” table accept different types units e g units volume mass Click sample table
Future reporting years:
End date for year end DD/MM/YYYY
Energy use estimates for territory/region
Number
Units
Number
Units
Number
Units
Number
Units
Number
Units

 
23 15 explain methodology used estimations assumptions
main objective reach target CO2 emission ( 11% occupant 2012) Considering target set intermediate goals energy consumption occupant (energy electricity electricity) paper consumption occupant business trips (Km occupant) Concerning energy intermediate goals set entity based 2008 consumption order reach 11% CO2 emissions occupant reduction plan consumption occupant entity prorated according occupants Group prorated consumption added estimation energy electricity consumption group level 2012

 
information

 
24 Planning (CDP6 Q3(c))
24 1 factor cost future emissions capital expenditures impact estimated costs investment decisions
base approach difference cost action cost inaction Concerning CO2 emissions consider estimation globally average price pasts months global tendency CO2 impacts taken account investment decisions paper French environmental law measure environmental cost (French tax paper consumption) environmental aspects Group working dispatching internally global cost CO2 cost integrated investment choices

 
information

 
Governance
25 Responsibility (CDP6 Q4(a))
25 1 Does Board Committee executive body overall responsibility climate change
Yes. (Please answer question 25.3 and 25.4) 

 
25 2 state overall responsibility climate change managed indicate highest level company responsibility climate change
head CSR reports Executive Committee

 
25 3 Board Committee executive body overall responsibility climate change
Executive committee

 
25 4 mechanism Board executive body reviews company’ s progress status regarding climate change
review progress climate change review CSR strategy CO2 reduction program validated Executive Committee regularly reviewed members

 
information

Download attachment
 
26 Individual Performance (CDP6 Q4(b))
26 1 provide incentives individual management climate change issues including attainment GHG targets
No. (Please go to question 27.1) 

 
26 2 incentives linked monetary rewards

 
26 3 entitled benefit incentives

 
information

 
27 Communications (CDP6 Q4(c))
27 1 publish information risks opportunities presented company climate change details emissions plans reduce emissions
Read Socié té Gé né rale’ s position climate change (http //csr socgen com/content/view/full/270)

 
indicate following apply provide details and/or link documents copy relevant excerpt 27 2 company’ s Annual Report mainstream filings
Yes 
http //www socgen com/sg//file/fichierig/documentIG_5197/sgregistrationdocument09 pdf

Download attachment
 
27 3 Voluntary communications (other CDP) Corporate Social Responsibility reporting
Yes 
http //csr socgen com/content/view/full/270

 
information

 
28 Public Policy (CDP6 Q4(d))
28 1 engage policymakers possible responses climate change including taxation regulation carbon trading
Yes 
Socié té Gé né rale particular present working groups professional organizations FBF MEDEF (French business confederation) AFEP involved think tank (Epe ORSE BiTC) order informed main lines term regulations hand Socié té Gé né rale supports Green Paper launched UNEP FI needed mobilise finance sector battle climate change

 
information

 
We have upgraded our website login. If you have registered to view CDP responses before December 23, please re-register and we will issue new login details.
  Join the CDP LinkedIn group Follow @cdp on Twitter          Subscribe to receive our monthly newsletter
  Connect with us          Newsletter
   
 
 
  © 2014 CARBON DISCLOSURE PROJECT, Registered Charity no. 1122330.
A company limited by guarantee registered in England no. 05013650