Search Results

 

You need to login or register to view this content

All our reports and results are available free of charge personal use, and/or non-commercial use, however, you must first register with us to view our data.

View full Terms and Conditions



Log In

Respondent CDP 2009: NiSource Inc.

General introduction
NiSource Fortune 500 company engaged natural gas transmission storage distribution electric generation transmission distribution NiSource operating companies deliver energy 3 8 million customers located high demand energy corridor stretching Gulf Coast Midwest New England


Risk and Opportunities
1 Regulatory Risks (CDP6 1(a)(i))
1 1 company exposed regulatory risks related climate change
We consider our company to be exposed to regulatory risks. 
Currently regulatory impacts associated climate change companies NiSource exclusively U S based company subject international regional Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction programs continues debate U S scope federal regional state programs manage GHG emissions prospect mandatory climate programs NiSource operating areas appears likely entirely clear timing final shape action(s) Federal legislation actively debated federal regulation developed addition state legislatures NiSource operating areas process approved certain bills related climate change state bills primarily focused mandatory emissions reporting voluntary reduction registries included date mandatory reductions Consumer attitude demand energy products services likely influenced broad array factors closely linked regulatory market forces resulting carbon constraints momentum builds reduce GHG emissions commercial risks potentially stem regulatory requirements increased energy costs customers NiSource subject financial risk related climate change Depending form future regulation NiSource subject significant future costs regulated utility NiSource revenues subject approval state federal regulatory commissions event commissions allow NiSource pass future climate related costs customers material impact NiSource cash flow profitability Compliance future regulatory requirements require NiSource expend large amounts capital Raising large amounts capital uncertain economic times present financial risks impact liquidity GHG related impact risk opportunity depend largely final shape(s) regulatory programs likely largely influenced ultimate outcome U S Congressional debate climate change alternative environmental legislative proposals formative stages NiSource active various forums including trade associations representing natural gas electric companies help shape potential regulations

 
information

 
2 Physical Risks (CDP6 1(a)(ii))
2 1 company exposed physical risks climate change
We consider our company to be exposed to physical risks. 
Yes difficult predict specific potential impacts resulting climatic changes NiSource businesses separate specific impact normal weather events potential long term effects systemic climate change NiSource operates extensive energy delivery comprised underground ground facilities located wide geographic area Extreme weather events creating physical damage NiSource’ s facilities result interruption delivery natural gas electricity Customer demand energy sensitive temperatures— electricity required summer cooling natural gas used heating winter changes temperature patterns impact demand energy

 
information

 
3 Risks (CDP6 1(a)(iii))
3 1 company exposed risks result climate change
We consider our company to be exposed to other risks. 
Question 1 1

 
information

 
4 Regulatory Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(i))
4 1 regulatory requirements climate change present opportunities company
Regulatory requirements present opportunities for my company. 
anticipated NiSource companies continue opportunity work regulators various states create appropriate mechanisms increase energy efficiency indirectly reduce GHGs Currently NiSource working regulators states implement demand programs offer variety incentives encouraging energy conservation efficiency improvements customers addition renewed growing support regulatory strategies separate decouple recovery fixed costs volume gas delivered customers NiSource continues working regulators formulate effective strategies expanding types programs broader customer base manner achieves overarching policy objectives sustainable way addition NiSource Natural Gas Transmission Storage businesses play role deployment carbon sequestration infrastructure NiSource operates nation's largest delivery systems natural gas key element NiSource's growth strategy includes expansion commercial growth natural gas pipeline storage businesses Carbon Capture Sequestration (CCS) technology currently development capture store CO2 emissions fossil fuel fired electric generating stations large point sources CO2 captured CO2 transported pipelines underground sequestration fields largest operators underground storage natural gas U S potential exists NiSource play role transporting storing CO2 emissions NiSource's interstate pipeline transverses near multiple U S oil production basins presenting opportunity develop CO2 pipeline systems support enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects economists predict demand natural gas increase GHG regulations enacted NiSource's Midwest Mid Atlantic pipeline storage network overlays large electric regions currently supplied coal fired power plants potentially presents multiple opportunities serve new natural gas fired generation NiSource investing natural gas storage pipeline infrastructure help meet increased customer demand mitigate variability natural gas costs customers timing extent climate change prompts new requirements reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) represent degree commercial opportunities NiSource given preliminary state climate change regulation quantification specific financial effects possible time

 
information

 
5 Physical Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(ii))
5 1 physical changes resulting climate change present opportunities company
We don’t know the answer to this question. 
Uncertain time

 
information

 
6 Opportunities (CDP6 1(b)(iii))
6 1 Does climate change present opportunities company
Climate change presents other opportunities for my company. 
NiSource currently pursuing greenhouse gas reduction projects potentially used offset future obligation sold

 
information

 
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Accounting, Emissions Intensity, Energy and Trading
7 Reporting Year (CDP6 Q2(a)(ii))
Information respond section “ Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)” developed World Resources Institute World Business Council Sustainable Development (“ GHG Protocol” ) http //www ghgprotocol org/ ISO 14064 1 compatible GHG Protocol number regional/national programme protocols information http //www ghgprotocol org/ use guidance button provide CDP responses questions 7 8 9 10 1 10 2 11 1 11 2 years prior current reporting year time answered CDP information request work backwards current reporting year enter data oldest reporting period Questions 10 1 10 2 11 1 11 2 subsequent webpages dates answer question 7 carried forwards automatically populate webpages
7 1 state start date end date year reporting GHG emissions
Start date 01 January 2008End date 31 December 2008Financial accounting year 01 January 2008

 
8 Reporting Boundary (CDP6 Q2(a)(i)) 8 1 indicate category describes company entities group Scope 1 Scope 2 GHG emissions reported
Companies over which operational control is exercised. 

 
8 2 state parts business sources GHG emissions excluded reporting boundary

 
9 Methodology (CDP6 Q2(a)(iii)) 9 1 process used company calculate Scope 1 Scope 2 GHG emissions including standard protocol methodology used collect activity data calculate Scope 1 Scope 2 GHG emissions provide answer text box addition description relevant select methodology list published methodologies aid automated analysis data
NiSource calculates corporate wide emissions using Climate Leaders GHG Inventory Guidance defines Partners working U S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) inventory report GHG emissions Guidance based existing GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting Reporting Standard developed World Resources Institute (WRI) World Business Council (WBC) Sustainable Development NiSource companies report emissions WRI control approach including Scope 1 Scope 2 identified Scope 3 emissions NiSource companies report nearly 100% GHG emissions produced operations include Scope 3 emissions related purchased power parties meet customer demand purpose reporting GHG emissions control defined ability introduce implement operational policy having operational control having majority entity NiSource businesses respective facilities U S based major GHGs considered inclusion emissions inventory Given nature operations following included emissions inventory carbon dioxide (CO2) nitrous oxide (N2O) methane (CH4) natural gas transmission storage distribution facilities CO2 N2O CH4 electric generating plants sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) electric power distribution operation total global MWh purchased electricity renewable sources estimated using U S EPA eGRID database EPA reports emissions electric generation facilities country eGrid database questionnaire uses data recent eGRID2006 Version 2 1 (April 2007) year 2004 summary tables eGRID database includes data types generating units production information generation resource/fuel mix data categorized various measures geographic area order estimate renewable percentage total MWh purchased electricity percentage generation renewable sources main geographic areas NiSource operates combined NiSource facilities operate areas covered Reliability Corporation (RFC) Southeast Reliability Corporation (SERC) renewable component estimated using biomass hydro wind solar components energy resource region averaging percentage calculate 3 6% renewable component global purchased electricity

 
Select methodologies
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)


 
provide

 
9 2 Details assumptions
Emission factors using industry standards

 
9 3 names links calculation tools used
Internal database using GRI WRI guidelines Maximo Essential reports

 
Select calculation tools

 
9 4 global warming potentials applied origin
Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Assessment Report Carbon Dioxide = 1Methane = 23Nitrous Oxide = 296Sulfur Hexafluoride = 22 200

 
9 5 emission factors applied origin
emission factors entire NiSource Corporation numerous origins GHG Calc AP 42 IPCC TAR IES Reporting Methodology GRI manufacturer's recommendations

 
information

 
10 Scope 1 Direct GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(b)(i))
Instructions question 10 question 11 (following page)When providing answers questions 10 11 deduct offset credits Renewable Energy Certificates net estimated avoided emissions export renewable energy carbon sequestration (including enhanced oil recovery) use goods services Opportunities provide details activities reduce avoid emissions provided information request Carbon dioxide emissions biologically sequestered carbon e g carbon dioxide burning biomass/biofuels reported separately emissions Scopes 1 2 3 relevant report emissions question 15 include nitrous oxide methane emissions biomass/biofuel combustion emissions scopes
answer following questions using Table 1 provide 10 1 Total gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions metric tonnes CO2 ePlease break total gross global Scope 1 emissions 10 2 Country regionPlease provide CDP responses questions 10 1 10 2 years prior current reporting year time answered CDP information request work backwards current reporting year enter data oldest reporting period Table 1 (below) table 5 (Q11 1 11 2) automatically populated dates answer 7 1 Electric utilities report emissions country/region using table question EU3 Table 1 use numbers Use “ Other” option drop menu enter region
Reporting year Q7.1 Start date 01/01/2008
Reporting year Q7.1 End date 31/12/2008
10.1 Total gross global Scope 1 GHG
emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e
29054546

10.2 Gross Scope 1 emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e by country or region

USA 29054546

 
answer question 10 1 automatically carried forward tables 2 3 add country region answer 10 2 press “ Save” end page tick box total gross global Scope 1 figure (Q10 1) includes emissions transferred outside reporting boundary (as given answer 8 1) report transfers 13 5

 
facilitate better understanding business break total global Scope 1 emissions 10 3 Business divisionand/or10 4 Facility10 3 Business division (only data current reporting year requested)Table 2 use numbers
Business Divisions - Enter names below
Scope 1 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q10.1 29054546
Natural Gas Transmission & Storage 554051
Natural Gas Distribution Operations 1582589
Electric Generation Unit 19376103
Electric Distribution 82311

 
10 4 Facility (only data current reporting year requested)Table 3 use numbers
Facilities - Enter names below
Scope 1 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q10.1 29054546

 
10 5 break total global Scope 1 GHG emissions metric tonnes gas metric tonnes CO2 e GHG type (Only data current reporting year requested )Table 4 use numbers
Scope 1 GHG Type
Unit
Quantity
CO2 Metric tonnes
CH4 Metric tonnes
CH4 Metric tonnes CO2-e
N2O Metric tonnes
N2O Metric tonnes CO2-e
HFCs Metric tonnes
HFCs Metric tonnes CO2-e
PFCs Metric tonnes
PFCs Metric tonnes CO2-e
SF6 Metric tonnes
SF6 Metric tonnes CO2-e

 
10 6 provided information Scope 1 emissions response questions explain reasons plans collecting Scope 1 GHG emissions information future
facilities list individually GHG inventory set aggregate GHG emission type

 
information

 
11 Scope 2 Indirect GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(b)(i))
Important note emission factors zero low carbon electricity purchased emissions factor use calculating Scope 2 emissions depends electricity purchase counted calculating grid average emissions factor – supplier Electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor electricity sourced grid electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor Scope 2 emissions calculated using grid average emissions factor company purchases electricity zero low carbon electricity tariff Electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor zero low carbon electricity sourced grid transmitted company electricity counted calculating grid average emissions factor specific method generation used provided certificates quantifying GHG related environmental benefits claimed electricity sold passed separately electricity purchased Click instructions previous page answering question 11
answer following questions using Table 5 provide 11 1 Total gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions metric tonnes CO2 e break total gross global Scope 2 emissions 11 2 Country regionPlease provide CDP responses questions 11 1 11 2 years prior current reporting year time answered CDP information request work backwards current reporting year enter data oldest reporting period Table 5 automatically populated dates gave answer 7 1 Table 5 use numbers Use “ Other” option drop menu enter region
Reporting year Q7.1 Start date 01/01/2008
Reporting year Q7.1 End date 31/12/2008
11.1 Total gross global Scope 2 GHG
emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e
259521

11.2 Gross Scope 2 emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e by country or region

USA 259521

 
answer 11 1 automatically carried forward tables 6 7 add country region answer 11 2 press “ Save” end page facilitate better understanding business break total global Scope 2 emissions 11 3 Business divisionand/or11 4 Facility11 3 Business division (only data current reporting year requested)Table 6 use numbers
Business Divisions - Enter names below
Scope 2 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q11.1 259521

 
11 4 Facility (only data current reporting year requested)Table 7 use numbers
Facilities - Enter names below
Scope 2 Metric tonnes CO2-e
Total gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e - answer to question Q11.1 259521

 
11 5 provided information Scope 2 emissions response questions explain reasons plans collecting Scope 2 GHG emissions information future

 
information

 
12 Contractual Arrangements Supporting Particular Types Electricity Generation (CDP6 Q2(b)(i) Guidance)
12 1 consider grid average factor used report Scope 2 emissions question 11 does reflect contractual arrangements electricity suppliers (for example purchase electricity using zero low carbon electricity tariff) calculate report contractual Scope 2 figure response question showing origin alternative emission factor information tariff

 
12 2 retire certificates (eg Renewable Energy Certificates) associated zero low carbon electricity provide details

 
information

 
13 Scope 3 Indirect GHG Emissions (CDP6 Q2(c))
following categories main sources emissions Report emissions metric tonnes CO2 e state methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions Notes question 13When providing answers question 13 deduct offset credits Renewable Energy Certificates net estimated avoided emissions export renewable energy carbon sequestration (including enhanced oil recovery) use goods services Opportunities provide details activities reduce avoid emissions provided information request Carbon dioxide emissions biologically sequestered carbon e g carbon dioxide burning biomass/biofuels reported separately emissions Scopes 1 2 3 relevant report emissions question 15 include nitrous oxide methane emissions biomass/biofuel combustion emissions scopes
13 1 Employee business travelDescribe main sources emissions
Emissions related employee business travel company owned vehicles aircraft estimated considered minimis Company owned vehicles aircraft included Scope 2 emission estimates

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 2 External distribution/logisticsDescribe main sources emissions
Emissions related external distribution/logistics tracked

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 3 Use/disposal company’ s products servicesFor auto manufacture auto component companies – refer additional questions sectors completing question 13 3 main sources emissions
NiSource accounts GHG emissions intensity metric determination associated purchased power parties meet customer demand

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e
2008 GHG emissions associated party purchases customer use 2 459 491 CO2 equivalents

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions
response question 9

 
13 4 Company supply chainDescribe main sources emissions
Emissions Company Supply Chain tracked

 
Emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
State methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 5 OtherIf reporting emissions fall categories categorise transferred emissions non transferred emissions (please guidance explanation terms) report transfers input fields non transfers input fields TransfersDescribe main sources emissions

 
TransfersReport emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
TransfersState methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions
Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO) supplies electricity customers Northern Indiana NIPSCO operates electrical generation facilities times purchases power grid (i e suppliers) meet electrical demand NIPSCO does operational control facilities does ownership party suppliers NIPSCO includes purchased power allow calculate total emissions intensity electricity provides customers NIPSCO quantifies amounts purchased suppliers year uses information estimate Scope 3 emissions total power purchased MWhrs converted estimated emissions using regional emissions intensity factor conversion accomplished use EPA eGRID database EPA reports emissions electricity generating facilities country eGRID database recent version eGRID2006 Version 2 1 (April 2007) used purpose data provided EPA categorized various measures geographic area generation according North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) regions Using NERC sub regions eGRID closest sub regions Reliability Corporation (RFC) Michigan Southeastern Electric Reliability Council (SERC) Midwest RFC West average CO2 emission factors regions 1680 3 lbs CO2 MWhr purchased method provides likely scenario power dispatched closest possible regions supply NIPSCO emission factor used purchase power totals measure Scope 3 CO2 emissions

 
Non transfersDescribe main sources emissions

 
Non transfersReport emissions metric tonnes CO2 e

 
Non transfersState methodology assumptions calculation tools databases emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used calculating emissions

 
13 6 provided information categories Scope 3 GHG emissions response questions explain reasons plans collecting Scope 3 indirect emissions information future

 
information

 
14 Emissions Avoided Use Goods Services (New CDP 2009)
14 1 goods and/or services enable GHG emissions avoided party provide details including estimated avoided emissions anticipated timescale emissions avoided methodology assumptions emission factors (including sources) global warming potentials (including sources) used estimations
Columbia Gas Ohio's WarmChoice (Low Income Weatherization Program) cumulative CO2 reduction estimate 1988 2008 1 522 981 tonnes CO2 2009 2011 WarmChoice Demand Management (DSM) (new 2009) projected cumulative CO2 reduction potential 457 808 tonnes CO2NIPSCO's Natural Gas DSM Program estimates Annual Net Therm Savings 2008 1 338 887 therms year measures implemented savings persist cumulatively approx 10 years Bay State Gas’ s DSM Program offers energy efficiency programs residential low income commercial industrial customers program shown annual net therm savings past years follows Year 1 (May 2004 April 2005) – 1 344 582 thermsYear 2 (May 2005 April 2006) – 1 858 752 thermsYear 3 (May 2006 April 2007) – 1 679 077 thermsYear 4 (May 2007 April 2008) – 2 072 883 therms

 
information
Columbia Gas Ohio WarmChoice CO2 reductions based customers served year*ccf saved year*20 year life measures WarmChoice ccf savings come variety external internal impact evaluation reports years WarmChoice 21st year impact evaluations performed estimate savings billing analysis using methods non participant control groups adjust gross net savings program typically serves customers usage averaging 1200ccf year performs attic wall insulation high efficiency furnaces air leakage sealing energy conservation measures WarmChoice unknown houses service longer saving "persistence savings" study suggests savings continue 10 year period houses weatherized particular year unknown level degradation gas savings occurred energy conservation measures 10 years persistence study longer term savings impact evaluations unknown DSM program related CO2 reductions include WarmChoice projections program implemented 2009 NIPSCO Home Energy Solutions (Targeted Income) Program savings estimated order verify actual savings Indiana Community Action Association (INCAA) reviews customer data 12 months prior 12 months following implementation measures programs just recently implemented estimated savings 430 therms home used NIPSCO currently process collecting supplying data INCAA review analysis NIPSCO's programs include Residential Prescriptive Incentives Low Income Weatherization New Construction Incentives Home Assessments Home Retrofits Elementary Education Multifamily Direct Install Staff Efficiency Culture Training Umbrella Marketing (Customer/Trade Ally Outreach Education) Bay State design implementation cost recovery Bay State’ s energy efficiency programs subject jurisdiction Massachusetts Department Public Utilities provisions Green Communities Act Bay State operates comprehensive energy efficiency programs market transformation initiatives targeting residential low income C& customer sectors December 2008 Bay State filed motion extend current DSM program years (2010 2012)

 
15 Carbon Dioxide Emissions Biologically Sequestered Carbon (New CDP 2009)
example carbon dioxide burning biomass/biofuels

 
15 1 provide total global carbon dioxide emissions metric tonnes CO2 biologically sequestered carbon Emissions metric tonnes CO2 use numbers

 
information
March 2008 EnergyUSA NiSource subsidiary joined Conservation Fund University Notre Dame initiative pools customer donations help address climate change restore sensitive wildlife habitat enhance parks wildlife refuges United States EnergyUSA’ s 4 500+ commercial industrial customers choose offset carbon dioxide emissions result natural gas use adding contribution $0 25 dekatherm monthly company pools customers’ donations passes 100% donations Conservation Fund land conservation nonprofit group Contributions support Conservation Fund’ s ZeroSM Carbon Sequestration program – effort plant native trees restore forested habitat wildlife enhance America’ s public recreation areas $4 30 received EnergyUSA effort Fund plants trees intended offset short ton carbon dioxide emissions equivalent atmosphere EnergyUSA unregulated natural gas marketing subsidiary NiSource company focused providing competitively priced energy services industrial commercial customers trading partners USA Conservation Fund nation's foremost environmental nonprofit dedicated protecting America's land water legacy current future generations Fund works integrate economic environmental goals helped partners safeguard wildlife habitat working landscapes community “ greenspace” historic sites totaling 6 million acres 1% fundraising costs 97% program allocation Conservation Fund recognized nation's rated environmental nonprofit American Institute Philanthropy Charity Navigator

 
16 Emissions Intensity (CDP6 Q3(b))
16 1 supply financial emissions intensity measurement reporting year combined Scope 1 2 emissions measurement
NiSource uses weighted average emissions intensity measure progress inventory broken subcomponent metrics relate 4 main emission types 1) electric power generation (tonnes CO2eq/megawatt hour) 2) natural gas combustion natural gas transmission (tonnes CO2 eq/brake horsepower hour) 3) vented fugitive methane natural gas transmission (tonnes CO2 eq/miles pipe) 4) vented fugitive methane distribution activities (tonnes CO2 eq/miles pipe) overall NiSource intensity (percent change 2001 base year) individual intensities weighted based percentage CO2e NiSource total inventory summed referenced base year index using index current year intensities entire corporation compared 2001 base year intensities

 
16 1 1 units example units metric tonnes CO2 e million Yen turnover metric tonnes CO2 e US$ profit metric tonnes CO2 e thousand Euros turnover
1) tonnes CO2eq/megawatt hour electric power generation 2) tonnes CO2 eq/brake horsepower hour transmission natural gas combustion 3) tonnes CO2 eq/miles pipe vented fugitive methane natural gas transmission 4) tonnes CO2 eq/miles pipe vented fugitive methane distribution activities

 
16 1 2 resulting figure Use decimal point necessary use “ ” “ ” e write 15 6 15 6

 
16 2 supply activity related intensity measurement reporting year combined Scope 1 2 emissions measurement
1 Gas Transmission Combustion = 572 82 CO2 eq tonnes / million bhp hr2 Gas Transmission Fugitive & Vented = 241 37 CO2 eq tonnes / mile 3 Gas Distribution = 28 1 CO2 eq tonnes / mile4 Electric Generation = 1 010 CO2 eq tonnes / MWhr

 
16 2 1 units e g metric tonnes CO2 e metric tonne output service sector businesses unit service provided
Tracked

 
16 2 2 resulting figure Use decimal point necessary use “ ” “ ” e write 15 6 15 6

 
information

 
17 Emissions History (CDP6 Q2(f))
17 1 emissions reporting year vary significantly compared previous years
Yes 
Emissions vary significantly previous years significant variations existing NiSource GHG emissions profile 2001 base year related electric generation changes • mothballing D H Mitchell Generation Station 525 MW coal fired electric generating facility • development increased utilization natural gas fired combined cycle electric generation resources including Whiting Clean Energy Sugar Creek Generating Whiting Clean Energy Sugar Creek developed highly efficient large natural gas fired combined cycle facilities case Whiting Clean Energy facility includes waste heat steam generation increased efficiency facilities produce power approximately half carbon intensity traditional coal fired power plant 2008 NiSource divested Whiting Clean Energy NIPSCO purchased Sugar Creek and• increase purchased power lower carbon intensity 2003 NiSource divested approximately 1000 MW lower carbon intensity generation sold Primary Energy subsidiary operations significantly improved overall GHG emission rate NiSource consistent Climate Leaders control inventory approach impacts included year year emissions profile divested (even continue operate provide low carbon intensity power NIPSCO service territory) GHG emissions inventory process detailed NiSource Inventory Management Plan (IMP) revised NiSource GHG Inventory Methodology Report Significant enhancements 2007 provide opportunity detailed analysis emissions emission changes time Changes result improved methodologies/techniques collaboration Interstate Natural Gas Association America (INGAA) American Gas Association (AGA) trade groups especially Natural Gas Transmission Storage (NGT& S) area modifications core assumptions add IMP annual review basis NiSource reported GHG summaries DOE EIA 1605b program EPA Climate Leaders program investor related requests 1605b report submitted accumulations GHG emissions related NiSource activities addition enhancement process undertaken early 2007 regard Natural Gas Star reporting procedures Reporting guidelines program examined compared field data generated 2006 previous years purpose review accurately reflect true GHG emission reductions authenticated verified used cross reporting GHG programs Natural Gas Star reports 2005 adapted reflect verifiable reductions NiSource utilize future reporting protocols addition specific reduction projects analyzed field testing conducted begin evaluation process determine potential additional GHG reductions Understanding NiSource's GHG emissions reduction opportunities helps NiSource comment developing policies activities

 
answer 17 1 Yes 17 1 1 Estimate percentage emissions vary compared previous reporting year box accept numerical answers containing decimal point use " " " " e write 10 6 10 6

 
emissions increased decreased

 
information

 
18 External Verification/Assurance (CDP6 Q2(d))
18 1 information reported response questions 10 – 15 externally verified/assured
None of the information provided in response to question 10-15 has been externally verified/assured in whole or in part. Please go to question 18.6. 

 
aid automated analysis responses select responses tick boxes use text box provided tick boxes menu options appropriate

 
18 2 State scope/boundary emissions included verification/assurance exercise

 
use text box scope/boundary emissions included verification/assurance exercise tick box menu options applicable

 
18 3 State level assurance (eg reasonable limited) given

 
18 4 Provide copy verification/assurance statement attach copy/copies

 
18 5 Specify standard information verified/assured
Inventory Management Plan (IMP) prepared serve guiding principle assure complete emissions inventory maintained time IMP prepared party implementation partner CH2M Hill Climate Leaders’ guidance WBCSD/WRI GHG Protocol consistent general energy sector practices Partnership program data submitted EPA 2006 desktop review inventories assure accuracy completeness technical soundness addition internal QA/QC peer review process Finally NiSource hired party gas sector greenhouse gas expert refine review inventory process resulted higher level accuracy inventory completed 2007 Typically 70 80% NiSource GHG emissions inventory consists emissions generated electric generating units regulated Acid Rain NOx Budget trading programs units incorporate monitoring systems required programs measure emissions carbon dioxide meet requirements U S EPA Code Federal Regulations Title 40 75 40 CFR 75 specifies types continuous monitoring systems used parameter (SO2 NOx CO2 ) sets forth operation maintenance quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) requirements ensure data collected monitoring systems continues accurate data 75 monitoring systems reported quality assured systems pass series certification tests demonstrate capable providing accurate emissions data Test methods developed EPA reputable standards organizations American Society Mechanical Engineers (ASME) used certify 75 monitoring systems addition high quality calibration gases used certification tests case fuel flow meters used certified using test methods cases design specifications published consensus standards organizations ASME AGA American Petroleum Institute (API)

 
18 6 information provided response questions 10 15 verified state plans GHG emissions accounting information externally verified/assured future

 
information

 
19 Data Accuracy (CDP6 Q2(e) – New wording CDP 2009)
19 1 main sources uncertainty data gathering handling calculations e g data gaps assumptions extrapolation metering/measurement inaccuracies gather emissions data select emissions data gathered proceed question 20
Emission data is gathered. 
Emission factor accuracy data gaps calculation assumptions primary sources uncertainty NiSource emission data gathering activities

 
19 2 uncertainties affect accuracy reported data percentage terms estimated standard deviation
NiSource considers vast majority GHG emissions inventory high accuracy electric generating natural gas transmission segment combustion emissions account 80 85% entire inventory qualify highly accurate emissions estimates NiSource electric generation units use redundant Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) U S EPA Code Federal Regulations Title 40 75’ s data substitution rules 75 substitute data values increasingly conservative ensure emissions reported remainder NiSource emissions taken conservative approach selecting emission factors corresponding emissions likely higher actual

 
19 3 Does company report GHG emissions mandatory voluntary scheme (other CDP) requires accuracy assessment
Yes (Please answer the following questions - 19.3.1, 19.3.2). 

 
19 3 1 provide scheme
Other 
1) NiSource reports GHG emissions U S EPA 40 CFR 75 Quarterly Reporting requirements emissions 2) U S EPA Gas Star3) Department Energy 1605b reporting4) TruCost5) Dow Jones Sustainability Index

 
19 3 2 provide accuracy assessment GHG emissions reported scheme report delivered
sources information used developing GHG emissions inventory NiSource calculated corporate wide emissions using Climate Leaders GHG Inventory Guidance defines Partners working EPA inventory report GHG emissions Guidance based existing GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting Reporting Standard developed World Resources Institute (WRI) World Business Council (WBC) Sustainable Development electric generating units covered U S EPA requires periodic performance evaluations monitoring systems ensure continued accuracy emissions data EPA regulations require utilities perform Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) using standard calibrate certify CEMS flow gas monitoring equipment

 
information
Innovative Environmental Solutions (IES) contracted NiSource 2007 prepare improved foundation data collection inventory development methodology documentation noted areas future improvement refinement 2006 inventory effort envisioned NiSource’ s continuous improvement process directed seeking incremental improvements previous years inventory efforts natural progression higher fidelity estimates NiSource's efforts achieve stated goals inventory quality transparency credibility QA/QC steps taken step inventory development process improve accuracy fidelity emission estimates IES staff NiSource GHG team members knowledgeable natural gas systems power generation facilities emissions characterization sources QA/QC checks activity data ensure accuracy reported emissions electrical generation units coal gas combusted reported NiSource compared heat input data submitted NiSource EPA Additionally carbon dioxide emissions reported NiSource come CEMS data reported U S EPA using MDC 4 software CO2 emissions NiSource's electric generating stations make largest portion inventory QA/QC process includes continuous improvement feedback provides corrective actions designed improve inventory estimates time

 
20 Energy Fuel Requirements Costs (New CDP 2009)
provide following information reporting year Cost purchased energy
20 1 total cost electricity heat steam cooling purchased company

 
Select currency

 
20 1 1 break costs individual energy type Table 8 “ Cost” column accept text use numbers
Energy type
Cost
Currency
 Electricity
 Heat
 Steam
 Cooling

 
Cost purchased fuel20 2 total cost fuel purchased company mobile stationary combustion

 
Select currency

 
20 2 1 breakdown costs individual fuel type Table 9 cost column accept text use numbers
Mobile combustion fuels
Cost
Currency

 
Stationary combustion fuels
Cost
Currency

 
Energy fuel inputsThe following questions designed establish company’ s requirements energy fuel (inputs) note MWh preferred unit answers helps comparability analysis usually associated electricity equally used represent energy content fuels (see CDP2009 Reporting Guidance information conversions MWh) Purchased energy input20 3 company’ s total consumption purchased energy MWh use numbers

 
Purchased self produced fuel input20 4 company’ s total consumption MWh fuels stationary combustion includes purchased fuels biomass self produced fuels relevant use numbers

 
answering question used Higher Heating Values (also known Gross Calorific Values) Lower Heating Values (also known Net Calorific Values) state used calculating answers

 
20 4 1 break total consumption fuels reported answer question 20 4 individual fuel type MWh Table 10 use numbers
Stationary combustion fuels
MWh

 
Energy outputIn question ask information energy MWh generated company fuel uses Comparing energy contained fuel combustion (question 20 4) energy available use combustion indication efficiency combustion processes taking industry sector account 20 5 total energy generated MWh fuels reported question 20 4 use numbers

 
20 6 total MWh renewable energy excluding biomass self generated company use numbers

 
Energy exportsThis question companies export energy surplus requirements example company use electricity combined heat power plant export heat organisation 20 7 percentage energy reported response question 20 5 exported/sold company grid parties use numbers

 
20 8 percentage renewable energy reported response question 20 6 exported/sold company grid parties use numbers

 
information

 
21 EU Emissions Trading Scheme (CDP6 Q2(g)(i) – New wording CDP 2009)
Electric utilities report allowances emissions using table question EU5 21 1 Does company operate ownership facilities covered EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)
No (Please go to question 22.) 

 
details 21 2 allowances allocated free year Phase II facilities operate (Even wholly facilities number allowances) Table 11 use numbers
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Free allowances metric tonnes CO2

 
21 3 total allowances purchased national auctioning processes period 1 January 2008 31 December 2008 facilities operate (Even wholly facilities total allowances purchased auctions facilities period) Total allowances purchased auction

 
21 4 total CO2 emissions 1 January 2008 31 December 2008 facilities operate (Even wholly facilities total emissions period )Total emissions metric tonnes

 
information

 
22 Emissions Trading (CDP6 Q2(g)(ii) New wording CDP 2009)
Electric utilities read EU6 answering questions
22 1 provide details emissions trading schemes EU ETS company participates likely participate years

 
22 2 overall strategy complying schemes required elected participate including EU ETS
NiSource wholly operates United States did participate CDM/JI project NiSource's CO2 emissions covered EU emissions Trading Scheme trading systems NiSource actively participating projects develop additional offset protocols trading programs intent utilize protocols establish elements necessary validate natural gas transmission storage reductions turn fosters incentive identify implement reduction projects sources advantage trading opportunities market participation

 
information

 
22 Carbon credits
22 3 purchased project based carbon credits
No. (Please go to question 22.5) 

 
indicate credits meet following commitments

 
22 4 Provide details including type unit volume vintage purchased standard/scheme credits verified issued retired (where applicable)

 
22 5 involved origination project based carbon credits
Yes. (Please answer the following question) 

 
22 6 provide details including • role project(s) • locations technologies involved • standard/scheme projects being/have developed • emissions reductions validated verified • annual volumes generated/projected carbon credits • Retirement method used compliance offsetting

 
22 7 involved trading allowances EU ETS and/or project based carbon credits separate business activity direct support business activity investment fund management provision offsetting services

 
22 8 provide details role performed

 
information

 
Performance
23 Reduction plans & goals (CDP6 Q3(a))
23 1 Does company GHG emissions and/or energy reduction plan place
Yes. (Please go to question 23.3) 

 
23 2 explain aid automated analysis responses select response options using text box just use text box provided options appropriate

 
menu options appropriate answer question using text box

 
Goal setting23 3 emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)
Yes. (Please answer the following questions) 

 
23 4 baseline year target(s)
2001

 
23 5 emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)
NiSource proposed reduce greenhouse gas intensity 7% 2001 2012 Total benefits NiSource’ s efforts anticipated reduce GHG emissions approximately 1 9 million tons CO2 equivalent 2012 projected emissions

 
23 6 sources activities target(s) applies

 
23 7 period/timescale does target(s) extend
2001 2012

 
information

 
23 GHG emissions energy reduction activities
23 8 activities undertaking planning undertake reduce emissions/energy use
ELECTRIC PRODUCTION PROPOSED EMISSION REDUCTION OPPORTUNITIESThe bulk capital investment reduction opportunities electric business following bullets summarize key opportunities undertaken • Heat Rate Improvement (capital intensive projects designed improve unit electric generation efficiency including turbine control upgrade condenser tube replacements cooling tower upgrade feed water heater upgrade air heater basket replacement ) • Generating station output/closing utilization new external power including efficient natural gas fired combined cycle gas turbine generation NIPSCO ceased operating coal fired generating stations D H Mitchell electric generating station ceased operations late 2001 NIPSCO securing cleaner external power commitments and/or internal generation • Electric steam turbine replacement projects dense pack configuration • Neural net artificial intelligence installations learn improve operation electric generation unit emissions efficiency profiles • Purchase lower GHG intensity power including pursuing purchase energy generated wind power • respect existing renewable generation NiSource currently operates hydroelectric plants combined generating capacity nearly 16 5 megawatts plants government sponsored price support mechanism • Plans introduce number DSM programs NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION STORAGE PROPOSED EMISSIONS REDUCTION OPPORTUNITIESNiSource companies active participant U S EPA Natural Gas Star program 1993 result participation NiSource continue invest programs reduce GHG emissions NiSource implemented following emission reduction programs • Directed inspection maintenance compressor stations metering stations • Identification rehabilitation programs reduce pipeline leakage • Identification replacement high bleed pneumatic devices • Installation excess flow valves • Reduction pressure needed • Installation lower emitting turbines compressor stations • Installation flares dehydration units • Use clock spring repairs permit defect remediation blowing pipeline segment • Installation dry gas seals installing new centrifugal compression • Use ultrasonic meters better identify fix leaks • Relocation gates reduce lost natural gas • Reduction natural gas loss compressor shutdown • Redesign blowdown emergency shutdown practices • Use fixed portable compressors pipeline pump downs • Installation electric starters • Rerouting glycol skimmer gas • Capture methane liquids tanks addition NiSource's Natural Gas Transmission Storage expanding transmission storage capabilities expansion projects incorporating lower emitting technology storing delivering gas lower GHG intensity NiSource Bay State Gas subsidiary partner development Brockton Brightfield Project install 425 kW solar power convert idle brownfield site productive revenue generating asset solar array largest New England largest brightfield nationwide generate 535 megawatt hours electricity year carbon free power 70 homes

 
information

 
23 Goal evaluation
23 9 benchmarks key performance indicators use assess progress emissions/energy reduction goals set

 
information

 
23 Goal achievement
23 10 emissions reductions energy savings associated cost savings achieved date result plan and/or activities described state methodology data sources used calculating reductions savings
TOTAL NISOURCE GHG INTENSITY IMPROVEMENTSUsing inventory weighting methodology weights individual business segment's GHG intensity improvement based percentage segment's total contribution inventory NiSource improved GHG intensity date 7 04% compared 2001 baseline

 
23 11 investment required achieve emissions reductions energy savings targets carry activities listed response question 23 8 period investment Table 13 “ Investment number” column accept text use numbers
Emission reduction target/energy saving target or activity
Investment number
Investment currency
Timescale

 
information
Question 23 8

 
23 Goal planning & investment
Electric utilities read table question EU3 giving details forecasted emissions
23 12 investment required achieve future targets set reduction plan carry activities listed response question 23 8 period expect payback investment Table 14 “ Number” column accept text use numbers
Plan or action
Investment number
Investment currency
Payback

 
23 13 estimate company’ s future Scope 1 Scope 2 emissions years main territories regions operate provide qualitative explanation expected changes impact future GHG emissions possible use table 15 structure answer question alternatively use text box

 
Scope 1 forecasted emissions Table 15 following units

 
Scope 2 forecasted emissions Table 15 following units

 
Table 15 “ Scope” columns accept text use numbers Type territory region giving data press “ Add Territory/Region” giving global figure instead separate figures regions territories write “ global” box labelled “ Enter territory region” Click sample table
Future reporting years:
End date for year end DD/MM/YYYY
Emission forecasts
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope 2

 
23 14 estimate company’ s future energy use years main territories regions operate provide qualitative explanation expected changes impact future GHG emissions possible use table 16 structure answer question alternatively use text box

 
Table 16 use numbers Type territory region giving data description data giving e g electricity consumption press “ Add Row” giving global figure instead separate figures regions territories use word “ global” table accept different types units e g units volume mass Click sample table
Future reporting years:
End date for year end DD/MM/YYYY
Energy use estimates for territory/region
Number
Units
Number
Units
Number
Units
Number
Units
Number
Units

 
23 15 explain methodology used estimations assumptions

 
information

 
24 Planning (CDP6 Q3(c))
24 1 factor cost future emissions capital expenditures impact estimated costs investment decisions
NiSource factors costs future emissions various forecasting models Low mid high level carbon pricing projections utilized projected demand estimate costs

 
information

 
Governance
25 Responsibility (CDP6 Q4(a))
25 1 Does Board Committee executive body overall responsibility climate change
Yes. (Please answer question 25.3 and 25.4) 

 
25 2 state overall responsibility climate change managed indicate highest level company responsibility climate change

 
25 3 Board Committee executive body overall responsibility climate change
early 1990’ s NiSource established Environmental Health Safety Committee Board Directors meets times annually address environmental matters including climate change

 
25 4 mechanism Board executive body reviews company’ s progress status regarding climate change
Regular updates provided EH& S Committee Board Directors NiSource executive management April 2009 Committee reviewed approved revised NiSource Climate Change Policy reads follows NiSource actively considers economic social environmental values conducting business activities course providing natural gas electricity serve customers’ energy needs core business activities NiSource companies result directly indirectly greenhouse gas emissions actions targeted reducing emissions NiSource companies committed meeting current future environmental obligations aggressively engage activities reduce potential risks pursue opportunities associated policies enacted address climate change issue NiSource committed continuing reduce carbon intensity operations NiSource meet energy needs customers address climate change issues business activities promote sustained economic growth manner compatible environmental obligations ends NiSource • Remain industry leader accurately accounting greenhouse gas emissions providing timely reporting transparency climate related activities • Increase efficiency reduce carbon intensity NiSource companies provide energy customers taking steps produce obtain electricity sources lower carbon intensity increase natural gas transportation efficiency reduce methane losses natural gas transmission distribution • Encourage customers use energy wisely working develop demand management energy conservation programs ensuring revenue models regulated NiSource companies recover costs aligned energy efficiency goals • Promote adoption reasonable policies addressing climate change regard NiSource support appropriately crafted federal legislation climate change Recognizes greenhouse gas reduction targets applicable sources greenhouse gas realistically achievable consistent projected availability commercial technology Protects undue increases energy costs particular regions groups consumers Recognizes environmental benefits natural gas promotes policies practices result continued efficient use natural gas customers

 
information

 
26 Individual Performance (CDP6 Q4(b))
26 1 provide incentives individual management climate change issues including attainment GHG targets
No. (Please go to question 27.1) 

 
26 2 incentives linked monetary rewards

 
26 3 entitled benefit incentives

 
information

 
27 Communications (CDP6 Q4(c))
27 1 publish information risks opportunities presented company climate change details emissions plans reduce emissions
Yes

 
indicate following apply provide details and/or link documents copy relevant excerpt 27 2 company’ s Annual Report mainstream filings
Yes 
Consistent Security Exchange Commission requirements NiSource internal review report climate change risks opportunities example quarterly annual reports 1995 NiSource submitted annual reports Department Energy climate related activity NiSource companies

 
27 3 Voluntary communications (other CDP) Corporate Social Responsibility reporting
Yes 
NiSource voluntarily publishes sustainability report external website describes company's performance it's progress reducing GHG emissions provides yearly metric results CO2 reductions Environmental Health & Safety Department establishes targets objectives reports progress various environmental activities highlighted report titled “ Sustainable Approach” report attempts summarize enterprise wide initiatives embody concepts corporate social responsibility report available NiSource website

 
information

 
28 Public Policy (CDP6 Q4(d))
28 1 engage policymakers possible responses climate change including taxation regulation carbon trading
Yes 
environmental regulatory proposals formation stages NiSource active various trade associations advocacy groups including Interstate Natural Gas Association America American Gas Association Edison Electric Institute NiSource worked groups individually help shape concepts important domestic action reduce GHG

 
information

 
Electric Utilities
EU1 Capacity
Click read instructions answering questions
company’ s historic forecasted installed nameplate capacity MW country energy source enter numbers Click instructions table works
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2001
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
01/01/2006 01/01/2007 01/01/2008 01/01/2009
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
31/12/2006 31/12/2007 31/12/2008 31/12/2009
USA Coal – hard 3609 3609 3609 3609
USA Gas (excluding OCGT CCGT CHP) 313 313 313 313
USA CHP 525 525 525
USA CCGT 565 565
USA Total thermal solid biomass
USA solid biomass
USA Hydro 10 10 10 10
USA Total country
Total countries

 
information

 
EU2 Production
historic forecasted production GWh country energy source Production expressed GWh MWh make numbers manageable enter numbers
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2001
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
01/01/2001 01/01/2002 01/01/2003 01/01/2004 01/01/2005 01/01/2006 01/01/2007 01/01/2008 01/01/2009 01/01/2010 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 01/01/2013
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
31/12/2001 31/12/2002 31/12/2003 31/12/2004 31/12/2005 31/12/2006 31/12/2007 31/12/2008 31/12/2009 31/12/2010 31/12/2011 31/12/2012 31/12/2013
USA Coal – hard 15749 14095 14712 15149 15804 14659 14775 15031 16057 16685 16819 17211 16998
USA Gas (excluding OCGT CCGT CHP) 14 7 6 6 30 15 29 18 29 32 36 39 35
USA CHP 678 931 794 1188 590
USA CCGT 184 450 610 1073 1085 1039
USA Total thermal solid biomass
USA solid biomass
USA Hydro 70 48 55 62 40 63 52 51 51 51 51 51 51
USA Total country
Total countries

 
information

 
EU3 Absolute Emissions
historic forecasted GHG emissions metric tonnes CO2 e country fuel type enter numbers
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2001
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
01/01/2006 01/01/2007 01/01/2008 01/01/2009 01/01/2010 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 01/01/2013
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
31/12/2006 31/12/2007 31/12/2008 31/12/2009 31/12/2010 31/12/2011 31/12/2012 31/12/2013
USA Coal – hard 16156632 16504325 16493836 16470713 17098856 17232375 17623789 17414382
USA CHP 275489 414905 197608
USA CCGT 71611 193500 264073 460483 463980 444201
USA Gas (excluding OCGT CCGT CHP) 12000 23200 14400 22670 24622 27718 30174 27664
USA Total thermal solid biomass
USA solid biomass
USA Total country
Total countries

 
information

 
EU4 Emission Intensities
historic forecasted GHG emissions intensities metric tonnes CO2 e/MWh country fuel type table accept numerical answers containing decimal point use " " " " e write 10 6 10 6
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2001
y/e 2002
y/e 2003
y/e 2004
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
01/01/2006 01/01/2007 01/01/2008 01/01/2009 01/01/2010 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 01/01/2013
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
31/12/2006 31/12/2007 31/12/2008 31/12/2009 31/12/2010 31/12/2011 31/12/2012 31/12/2013
USA Coal – hard 1 096 1 11 1 097 1 026 1 025 1 025 1 024 1 025
USA Gas (excluding OCGT CCGT CHP) 0 807 0 807 0 807 0 78 0 778 0 779 0 779 0 779
USA CHP 0 347 0 349 0 334
USA CCGT 0 39 0 43 0 433 0 429 0 427 0 427
USA Total thermal solid biomass
USA solid biomass
USA Total country 1 014 0 998 1 01 1 01 1 003 0 988 0 988 0 99
Total countries

 
information

 
EU5 Emission allowances companies EU Emissions Trading Scheme
historic forecasted position emissions emission allowances (EUAs) Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) Emission Reduction Units (ERUs) metric tonnes CO2 country
Phase I
(2005-2007)
Phase II
(2008-2012)
2005 - 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012

 
information

 
EU6 Emission allowances companies significant operations outside EU installations covered emissions trading regimes
historic forecasted position emissions emission allowances offsets metric tonnes CO2 CO2 e appropriate trading scheme Data provided trading scheme company significant participation (i e covers operations lead 5% total company emissions) table appropriate trading scheme participate supply data suitable format exclude voluntary offsets enter numbers
Enter reporting period dates. The 12-month period must end in the year listed at the top of the column.
y/e 2005
y/e 2006
y/e 2007
y/e 2008
y/e 2009
y/e 2010
y/e 2011
y/e 2012
y/e 2013
 
Start date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
End date DD/MM/YYYY for reporting year
Select units: Metric Tonnes CO2 or CO2-e

 
information

 
We have upgraded our website login. If you have registered to view CDP responses before December 23, please re-register and we will issue new login details.
  Join the CDP LinkedIn group Follow @cdp on Twitter          Subscribe to receive our monthly newsletter
  Connect with us          Newsletter
   
 
 
  © 2014 CARBON DISCLOSURE PROJECT, Registered Charity no. 1122330.
A company limited by guarantee registered in England no. 05013650